ARUJ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary
This matter concerns a challenge to a notification issued by the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) which purported to amend the Special Procedure for Ginning Industry Rules, 1996. The core legal question was whether the CBR possessed the statutory authority to amend rules that were originally framed by the Federal Government under Section 71 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. The petitioners argued that since the Federal Government was the rule-making authority under the statute, the CBR lacked the power to amend these rules. The Lahore High Court held that the Sales Tax Act, 1990 grants the power to prescribe special procedures solely to the Federal Government, and the Act contains no provision authorizing the CBR to frame or amend such rules. Consequently, the Court declared the impugned notification issued by the CBR to be ultra vires, without lawful authority, and of no legal effect. The key principle laid down is that an authority lacking the original rule-making power cannot amend or vary rules framed by the competent authority, absent specific statutory delegation.
- Does the Central Board of Revenue have the authority to amend rules framed by the Federal Government under Section 71 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990?
- Can an authority that did not issue the original notification or frame the original rules amend or vary them?
- Is a notification issued by the Central Board of Revenue ultra vires if it amends rules that the Board lacks the statutory power to amend?
- Section 71, Sales Tax Act 1990
' This judgment shall dispose of Writ Petitions Nos.6694 of 1998, 6695 of 1998 and 712 of 1998 in all of which same controversy is involved.
2. In exercise of the powers conferred upon it by section 71 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the Federal Government had laid down special procedure for the levy and payment of sales tax on the ginning industries by framing the Special Procedure for Ginning Industry Rules, 1996 which were notified on 10-11-1996. By subsequent notification bearing S.R.O. No,820(I)/97, dated 23-9-1997, the Central Board of Revenue purported to amend the aforesaid Rules by incorporating Rule 6. This amendment has been challenged in this petition, inter alia, on the ground that the Rules having been framed by the Federal Government, the same could only be amended by it and not the Central Board of Revenue.
3. The contention raised by the petitioner's learned counsel is unexceptionable. A reference to section 71 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 shows that it is the Federal Government which has been granted the power to prescribe special rules of the scope and payment of sales tax and other allied matters. There is nothing in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which permits the Central Board of Revenue either to frame Rules laying down special procedure or amend the Rules framed by the Federal Government in that behalf. Even on general principle, it is the Authority which had issued first notification or taken first decision, which can amend or vary the same. In this view of the matter, there is no option but to hold that the amendment in the Rules vide S.R.O. No,820(1)/97, dated 23-9-1997 is ultra vires the power of the Central Board of Revenue.
4. Mr. Imtiaz R. Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner wanted to argue certain other points but as the petitions are liable to succeed on to ground of lack of power in the Central Board of Revenue to amend the Rules, I am not inclined to enter into any further controversy.
' In view of above, these petitions are allowed and the impugned notification, dated 23-9-1997 is declared to be without any lawful authority and of no legal effect. No order as to costs.
Cited by 7 cases
- Haji SULTAN AHMED vs CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2008 PTD 103
- SHAHEEN WELFARE SOCIETY, (REGD.) through General Secretary vs ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, PUNJAB, LAHORE through Director-General and 7 others 2005 CLD 1267
- THE COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX and others vs SUPERIOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD. and others 2001 PTD 1486
- COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX Versus SUPERIOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD 2001 PLD 600
- M/S. NAFEES COTTON MILLS LTD., LAHORE vs INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 2001 P.C.T.L.R. 904
- The Collector Of Sales Tax And And Other vs Superior Textile Mills PTCL 2001 CL. 237
- Haji Sultan Ahmed vs Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 5 others PTCL 2008 CL. 499