Pakistan Case Law
1998 SCMR 2738

Col. (Retd.) M.R. HASSAN vs S.H.O MARGALLA, ISLAMABAD and others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1998 SCMR 2738
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No,274 of 1995 Writ Petition No,1331 of 1993
Date1995-11-27
Judge(s)Zia Mahmood Mirza, Muhammad Munir Khan and Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri
ResultLeave refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition for leave to appeal was filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan challenging an order passed by the High Court. The core legal question addressed by the Court was whether a petitioner can bypass the available remedy of an Intra-Court Appeal (I.C.A.) by approaching the Supreme Court directly. The Supreme Court declined to entertain the petition, holding that the petitioner failed to exhaust the alternative remedy of an Intra-Court Appeal available within the High Court's jurisdiction. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the appropriate Intra-Court Appeal before the High Court if so advised. The principle established is that the Supreme Court will generally not entertain a petition for leave to appeal where an adequate and efficacious remedy, such as an Intra-Court Appeal, has not been exhausted by the aggrieved party. The Court emphasized the necessity of exhausting lower appellate forums before invoking the jurisdiction of the apex court, thereby reinforcing the procedural requirement of exhausting alternative legal remedies.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a petitioner approach the Supreme Court directly when an Intra-Court Appeal remedy is available in the High Court?
  • Is a petition for leave to appeal maintainable if the petitioner has bypassed an available Intra-Court Appeal?
Intra-Court Appealexhaustion of remediesleave to appealjurisdictionprocedural lawappellate remedy

ORDER

1. ' The order impugned in this petition for leave to appeal could have been challenged in Intra-Court Appeal but the petitioner chose to come to this Court directly without availing the remedy of I.-C.A.

2. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this petition which is accordingly dismissed with the observation that the petitioner, if so advised, may file I.-C.A. In the High Court.

Cited by 6 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.