Cr. ZAKHIM KHAN MASOOD vs THE STATE
This petition for leave to appeal arose from the High Court's dismissal of the petitioner's bail application on the ground of illness. The petitioner was accused of misappropriating public funds under sections 409, 468, 471, 477-A, and 109 of the Pakistan Penal Code, read with section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The core legal question was whether the petitioner, suffering from ischemic heart disease, qualified as a sick and infirm person entitled to bail under the first proviso to section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court of Pakistan allowed the petition and granted bail, holding that the petitioner's continued detention posed a serious hazard to his life due to stress and strain. The Court laid down the principle that where medical evidence establishes that continued detention in custody is likely to have hazardous effects on a patient's life and slow down recovery, the accused is entitled to bail on the ground of sickness and infirmity.
- Whether an accused suffering from ischemic heart disease qualifies as a sick and infirm person entitled to bail under section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
- Can bail be granted on medical grounds if continued detention in custody is likely to have hazardous effects on the life of the accused?
- What standard of medical evidence is required to establish that detention poses a serious danger to an accused's life for the purpose of granting bail?
- sections 409/468/471/477-A/109, P.P.C.
- section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
- section 497, Cr.P.C.
ORDER
1. ' RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN, J.---On 9-4-1997 at 3-00 p.m., on the information of Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Director-General Audit, Defence Services, a case under sections 409/468/471/477-A/109, P.P.C., read with section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 was registered with Police Station No,7, Assets Branch, F.I.A., Rawalpindi .For having misappropriated public funds during the period from 1991 to 1995 in the Office of G.E. (Army) East and G.E.(Army), West, Rawalpindi. On merits, bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by the High Court on 24-7-1997. The High Court was moved by the petitioner for his release on bail on ground of illness. This application was dismissed by the High Court vide impugned order dated 16-12-1997. This petition for leave to appeal has been instituted against the impugned order dated 16-12-1997.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Attorney-General at some length. Record of the case has also been read by us. The contention of the learned counsel is that the petitioner is sick and infirm within the meaning of section 497, Cr.P.C. He has, therefore, earned his right to be released on bail on the aforesaid ground. To support the plea, learned counsel has relied upon the medical report which has been sent in compliance with order of this Court dated 4-3-1998. The report is as follows:-- "It is submitted that reports of Exercise Tolerance Test done in AFIC/NIHD, Rawalpindi and Thallium scan done in AFIP, Rawalpindi in respect of Mr.Zakhim Khan Mahsood who is admitted in this Institute suggest Ischaemic Heart Disease. The coronary angioraphy studies are being completed.
2. ' It is further submitted that the contained detention of Mr.Zakhim Khan Mahsood a patient of Ischaemic Heart Disease is likely to have adverse hazardous effects on his life because stress and strain can aggravate his disease condition."
3. It has been observed by the doctor in the above report that the ailment with which the petitioner is suffering, is likely to have hazardous effects on his life because stress and strain may aggravate his disease. The petitioner is, undoubtedly, sick and as such, needs treatment in conducive conditions free from any kind of pressure. In custody, it cannot be said that the petitioner shall have full peace of mind. His recovery from ailment shall, surely, be slow if he remains in detention. We are, therefore, satisfied to observe that the petitioner's life may seriously be to danger if he is not released on bail. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs,5,00,00,000 (rupees five crore) with two sureties of 2 and a half crore each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. On 20-3-1998, the petitioner was released on bail on the basis of our short order.
4. These are the reasons in support of the said order.
Cited by 19 cases
- Abdul Ghaffar vs Federation Of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan and 2 others 2021 P Cr. L J 1270
- Muhammad Bilal Sheikh vs National Accountability Bureau through Chairman and another 2020 P Cr. L J 671
- Muhammad Bilal Sheikh vs National Accountability Bureau through its 2020 IHC 6
- Sibtain alias Sippi vs State and another PLJ 2021 Cr.C. 1652
- Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif vs The State through Chairman, National 2019 PLD Islamabad 343, 2019 PLJ Islamabad 158, 2019 PLJ Karachi 163, 2019
- SHARJEEL INAM MEMON and others vs NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2019 YLR 1426
- Raja MUHAMMAD RIZWAN Versus State 2017 MLD 1522
- Dr. ASIM HUSSAIN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad 2018 YLRN 154
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL vs STATE etc. 2018 PLJ Islamabad 17, 2018 KLR Criminal Cases 18
- Muhammad lqbal vs The State, etc. 2018 KLR Criminal Cases 18
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL Versus State 2017 PCrLJ 674
- (1) Dr.Asim Hussain (2) Usman Moazzam (3) Anees Qaimkhani (4) M.A.Rauf 2016 SHC 20
- Dr. ASIM HUSSAIN Versus State 2017 PCrLJ 631
- NOOR UL QAMAR Versus State 2016 PCrLJN 44
- Malik FAYYAZ vs THE STATE 2008 YLR 2457
- IMTIAZ JAWED vs THE STATE 2008 PLD Karachi 522
- KHURSHEED ALAM Versus State 2005 PCRLJ 582
- TARIQ NAZIR vs THE STATE 2003 YLR 2550
- MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus THE STATE 2001 PCRLJ 180