Pakistan Case Law
1998 SCMR 552

DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, GUJRANWALA and others vs ANWAR

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1998 SCMR 552
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 186‑L of 1997
Date1997-02-22
Judge(s)Abdul Hafeez Memon and Irshad Hasan Khan
Authored byAbdul Hafeez Memon
ResultLeave refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition is directed against the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal which allowed a service appeal filed by the respondent regarding seniority and promotions in the Punjab Police. The respondent was appointed as an Assistant Sub-Inspector along with others whose batchmates were confirmed earlier, while the respondent's confirmation was delayed due to a pending inquiry and failure to cross an efficiency bar. The core legal question was whether a civil servant exonerated in an inquiry and facing only minor matters can be lawfully deprived of seniority and promotion along with his batchmates. The Supreme Court held that the Service Tribunal correctly considered the relevant facts, noting the respondent was exonerated and the punishments were of a minor nature under the rules, thereby not warranting deprivation of seniority and promotions. The petition was dismissed as no question of law of public importance was involved, affirming that an exonerated employee is entitled to due seniority and consequential benefits.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether a civil servant can be deprived of seniority and promotion when exonerated in a departmental inquiry?
  • Does the withholding of promotion due to failure to cross an efficiency bar justify denying retrospective seniority upon exoneration?
  • When does a service matter involve a question of law of public importance to warrant interference by the Supreme Court?
service appealseniority and promotionpolice serviceexoneration from inquiryefficiency barSupreme Court of Pakistan

' ABDUL HAFEEZ MEMON, J.---This petition is directed against the judgment, dated 28-11-1996, passed by the learned Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, allowing service appeal filed by respondent No, 1 . Against denying him due seniority and promotions alongwith his batchmates appointed as A.S.Is. In the Punjab Police.

2. The respondent was appointed as A.S.I. In the Police Department along with others. Thereafter, his batchmates were confirmed as A.S.Is. From 1-12-1973, but the respondent was not confirmed with his batchmates and was confirmed w.e.f, 23-7-1979, and because of it he was also denied further promotions in the department alongwith his batchmates, on the ground that there was an inquiry pending against him. It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent was exonerated in the inquiry. He, however, contended that since the promotion of the respondent was withheld because of his failing to cross the efficiency bar he was not entitled to the seniority and promotion etc., as claimed by him.

3. The Service Tribunal duly considered the very contentions raised by the learned counsel before us and found that as the respondent was exonerated in the inquiry and the said punishments were of minor nature, therefore, under the rules, he could not be deprived of his seniority and promotions alongwith his batchmates and allowed the appeal with certain consequential directions. Hence, this petition by the Department.

4. We have gone through the judgment of the Tribunal, and we are of the view that the same has been passed by the Tribunal on relevant considerations, and no question of law of public importance is involved to call for interference by this Court.

Cited by 8 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.