MUHAMMAD ASLAM vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
This matter before the Supreme Court of Pakistan arose out of a petition for leave to appeal concerning the character and ownership status of certain immovable commercial properties. The core legal issue brought before the Court was whether the shops bearing numbers B-682, B-683, and B-684 were constructed and owned by an evacuee named Chandar Parkash, thereby legally constituting evacuee properties subject to relevant evacuee property laws. Upon hearing the arguments presented by the learned counsel for the petitioner at considerable length, the Supreme Court determined that the matter raised substantial legal and factual questions requiring further examination. Consequently, the Court granted leave to appeal to consider and determine the exact ownership history and whether the subject shops fell within the legal classification of evacuee property.
- Whether leave to appeal should be granted to determine if specific shops constitute evacuee property based on their construction and ownership by an evacuee?
ORDER
1. ' ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, J.---We have heard the learned counsel of the petitioner at considerable length and grant leave to appeal to consider whether the shops bearing No,B-682, B-683 and B- 684 were constructed and owned by Chandar Parkash evacuee and as such were evacuee properties.