Pakistan Case Law
1998 PLC (C.S.) 1024

MUHAMMAD AZHAR MALIK vs THE DIRECTOR, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1998 PLC (C.S.) 1024
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1128 of 1997
Date1998-04-02
Judge(s)Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar
Authored byIrshad Hasan Khan
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter originated as a petition for leave to appeal under Article 212(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, challenging a judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal which had dismissed the petitioner's appeal against adverse remarks recorded in his Annual Confidential Report (A.C.R.) for the year 1995. The core legal question concerned the validity and finality of these adverse remarks in the context of ongoing disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. With the consent of both parties, the Supreme Court disposed of the petition by directing the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, to conclude the pending disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner via Charge Sheet No. 3400/D-18 within 60 days. The Court held that the adverse remarks in the petitioner's A.C.R. shall remain contingent upon the final outcome of these disciplinary proceedings. This judgment establishes the principle that adverse entries in a civil servant's service record may be rendered subject to the final determination of related disciplinary inquiries, ensuring procedural fairness and preventing premature prejudice to the employee's service record.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can adverse remarks in an Annual Confidential Report be made subject to the final outcome of pending disciplinary proceedings?
  • Does the Supreme Court have the authority to set a timeline for the completion of departmental disciplinary proceedings under Article 212(3) of the Constitution?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Article 212(3), Constitution of Pakistan 1973
Annual Confidential Reportadverse remarksdisciplinary proceedingscivil serviceservice tribunalexpeditious disposal

' IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.---This petition under Article 212(3) of the Constitution, is directed against the judgment, dated 4-9-1997, passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against adverse remarks recorded in his A.C.R. For the year 1995.

2. With consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Attorney-General, the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan, Rawalpindi, is directed to ensure that disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant to the Charge Sheet No,3400/D- 18, dated 29-1-1996, are completed as expeditiously as possible but not later than 60 days from today.

3. Resultantly, the petition is converted into appeal and disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Needless to observe that the adverse remarks entered in the A.C.R. Of the petitioner shall be subject to final result of the disciplinary proceedings against him. .

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.