MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another vs THE STATE
This matter concerns an application for the suspension of sentence and grant of bail pending the disposal of an appeal. The petitioner was convicted on February 12, 1996, and filed an appeal on February 18, 1996, resulting in a delay of over three years and six months without the appeal being decided. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to the suspension of his sentence and release on bail solely on the ground of statutory delay in the disposal of his appeal, where the state failed to show that the delay was attributable to the appellant. The Lahore High Court held that since the delay was not caused by the appellant and a substantial period of over three and a half years had elapsed, the sentence should be suspended. The Court laid down the principle that an appellant is entitled to the suspension of sentence and bail when there is an inordinate delay in the disposal of their appeal, provided the delay is not attributable to the conduct of the appellant.
- Whether an appellant is entitled to the suspension of sentence and grant of bail if their appeal has remained pending for over three years without disposal?
- Does the failure of the State to prove that the delay in disposing of an appeal was caused by the appellant justify the suspension of the appellant's sentence?
ORDER
1. Bail is sought on the ground of delay in disposal of the appeal. The petitioner was convicted on 12- 2-1996 and appeal was filed on 18-2-1996 as such a period of more than three years and six months has expired till today, The learned counsel for the State has not been able to show that delay has been caused by the appellant, The co-accused of the petitioner stands sentenced to death because the deceased succumbed to injuries caused by firearm and co-accused is responsible for causing the death. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case lest it may not prejudice the case of either party at the time of ultimate hearing of the appeal, we hereby suspend the sentence of the petitioner. He will be released from jail provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 (one lac) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
Cited by 1 case
- MOULA BUX and anothers vs THE STATE 2003 P Cr. L J 394