Pakistan Case Law
2000 PLC (C.S.) 118

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and another vs Ch. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and another

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2000 PLC (C.S.) 118
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal. Nos,718-L, 719-L and 961-L of 1999,
Date1999-09-23
Judge(s)Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar
ResultPetition dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition for leave to appeal arose from a service matter concerning the suspension of civil servants. The core legal question before the Supreme Court of Pakistan was whether the High Court possessed jurisdiction to adjudicate matters relating to the terms and conditions of service, specifically the suspension of a civil servant, given the constitutional bar on such jurisdiction. The Supreme Court affirmed that matters pertaining to the terms and conditions of service, including suspension, fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal, and the High Court's jurisdiction is barred under Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973. However, despite this clear legal position regarding jurisdiction, the Court declined to interfere with the High Court's impugned order in this specific instance. The Court held that the continuous suspension of the respondents was ex facie unjustified, rendering the case unsuitable for interference. The Court emphasized that this decision was strictly confined to the unique facts of the present case and did not alter the established principle regarding the exclusive jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal in service-related disputes.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the Service Tribunal have exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate matters relating to the suspension of a civil servant?
  • Is the jurisdiction of the High Court barred in matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of a civil servant under Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973?
  • Can the Supreme Court decline to interfere with an impugned order of the High Court even if the High Court lacked jurisdiction, based on the specific facts of the case?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Article 212, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
service mattercivil servantsuspension from servicejurisdiction of Service TribunalArticle 212constitutional bar

ORDER

1. ' We are inclined to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matters relating to terms and conditions of service of the civil servants also include suspension from service of a civil servant and that the Service Tribunal alone has the jurisdiction to adjudicate upon such matters in appropriate proceedings. The jurisdiction of the High Court is clearly barred in such matters under Article 212 of the Constitution.

2. ' Be that as it may, in the instant case, we find that continuous suspension from service of the respondents was ex facie unjustified. This is, therefore, not a fit case for interference with the impugned order of the High Court. This order is, however, confined to the facts of this case alone.

3. ' Resultantly the petition is dismissed and leave declined.

Cited by 8 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.