SHAMRAIZ KHAN vs THE STATE
This petition for leave to appeal arose from the Balochistan High Court's dismissal of the petitioner's bail application in a case registered under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 420, and 109 of the PPC, read with Section 5(2) of Act II of 1947, involving the short delivery of government wheat worth approximately fifteen crore rupees. The petitioner, a government contractor, allegedly conspired with eighteen Food Department officials. The Supreme Court of Pakistan considered whether the petitioner's interim bail should be confirmed given that seventeen co-accused officials had already been granted bail and a major portion of the embezzled amount was recovered or secured. The Court confirmed the interim bail subject to the deposit of the petitioner's bank securities worth over forty-nine million rupees with the High Court. Crucially, the Court laid down that government assets and funds are held by departments and officials as trustees for the people of Pakistan, strongly disapproving of the administrative exoneration of co-accused officials and the continued awarding of contracts to the accused petitioner.
- Whether interim bail can be confirmed in a financial embezzlement case subject to the secure deposit of the remaining disputed amount?
- Does the grant of bail to seventeen co-accused government officials entitle the principal accused contractor to bail under the rule of consistency?
- What is the legal status of government officials and departments in relation to public funds and state-owned assets?
- sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 420, 109, P.P.C.
- section 5(2) Act II of 1947
ORDER
' NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.---This petition is filed by accused Shamraiz Khan (F.I.R. No.8/97 registered at the Anti-Corruption Establishment, Balochistan, Quetta, under sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 420, 109, P.P.C. Read with section 5(2) Act II of 1947) seeking leave against the judgment of the Balochistan High Court dated 17-7-1998 dismissing his plea for bail.
' When this petition came up for orders in Chambers on 5-8-1998 before this Court, the petitioner was granted interim bail in the sum of rupees ten million with one surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar of the Balochistan High Court.
2. We have heard Mr. Azizullah Shaikh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, along with Mr. Muhammad Riaz Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record, for the petitoner, and Malik Sikandar Khan, learned Advocate- General, Balochistan, for the State. It appears from the submissions made and from the record that, alongwith petitioner Shamraiz Khan, there are 18 co-accused all of whom are officials of the Food Department, Government of Balochistan. It is informed by the learned Advocate-General that one of the co-accused, namely, Abdul Salam, is absconding and all the other 17 co-accused have already been granted bail.
3. According to the prosecution, as contractor of Food Department, the petitioner, in conspiracy with the co-accused, who are all officials in the Food Department short delivered wheat in bags owned by the Government value whereof came to about Rs.15 crores. It is informed by the learned Advocate-General that a major portion of the said amount has already been deposited by the petitoner and, acording to his instructions, about 5,25,00,000 (Rupees five crore twenty-five lacs) are yet to be recovered.
' Mr. Azizullah Shaikh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Mr. M. Riaz Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record, appearing for the petitioner, informed that securities of the petitioner in the sum of about rupees five crores are lying with the Prudential Commercial Bank Limited, Quetta, and these securities can be encahsed and the amount taken by the Department.
' When this matter was taken up today in the morning, Manager of the concerned Bank was summoned. Mr. Muhammad Akhtar Arain, V.P./Chief Manager, Prudential Commercial Bank Ltd., Quetta, has appeared and informed that securities of the petitioner to the tune of about rupees 49 million are lying with the Bank. He was asked to submit a statement in writing that the amount represented by the securities would be deposited with the Registrar of the High Court of Balochistan, Quetta. The Chief Manager of the Bank has placed on record a statement on behalf of his Bank which reads as under:-- "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN ' It is certified that the Securities of Rs.49,400,391 of Mr. Shamraiz Khan Government contractor we the Bank are bound to pay the same amount of Rs.49,400,391 to the Registrar, High Court Balochistan, Quetta within the week."
4. In this case where the 17 co-accused, who are Government officials, have already been granted bail and more or less the entire amount has been deposited or is going to be deposited; according to the learned counsel it is a case where the interim bail is liable to be confirmed.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case interim bail granted to the petitioner on 5-8-1998 is confirmed subject to deposit of Rs.49,400,391 (rupees C four crore ninety-four lacs three hundred and ninety-one) by the Prudential Commercial Bank Limited, Quetta, on behalf of the petitioner with Nazir of Baloshistan High Court within one week from today. The Provincial Government can withdraw this amount by making an application to the Honourable Chief Justice of the Balochistan High Court.
6. When this matter had come up earlier, we had directed a statement to be filed giving details of the accused in the criminal case, the amounts already recovered and the action, if any, taken by the Government against the defaulting officials of the Food Department under the Efficiency and Discipline Rules. Such statement has been filed by the Advocate-General. On a query from the Court, it is informed by the Advocate-General, on instructions from Capt. (Retd.) Muhammad Younus Durrani, Director Food, Government of Baloshistan, that, out of 18 co-accused, 9 have been exonerated of the charges on the administrative side. It is further informed that according to the inquiry officer in the case on administrative side, these are minor irregularities on the part of the nine defaulting officials and the Competent Authority, i.e. Commissioner Kalat, surprisingly, accepting the recommendations of the inquiry officer, has exonerated the nine officials on the administrative side. We would not like to make any observation here, which may prejudice the criminal trial but we do record our strong disapproval of the manner in which the proceedings under Efficiency and Discipline Rules have been drawn and concluded at least against 9 officials/co-accused. It was informed by the Advocate-General that even after payment of Rs.49,400,391 pursuant to this Order, a sum of about three million rupees still remains due, but, according to instructions, such balance will be adjusted against future bills of the petitioner- accused. From this, it follows that petitioner Shamraiz Khan is still getting contracts from the Food Department, Government of Baloshistan. It is shocking state of affairs. Every rupee and every grain of wheat belonging to the Government is essentially the property of the people of Pakistan and the concerned Government Department and all concerned Government officials hold such money and assets as trustees from the people of Pakistan. A copy of this order may be sent to the Chief Secretary, Baloshistan.
7. This petition is converted into appeal and disposed of in the terms of this order.
Cited by 21 cases
- Mumtaz Ali vs The State thr. Chairman NAB and Others 2024 SCP 98, 2024 SCMR 749
- Saddique Ali Laghari vs Fed. of Pakistan and Others 2021 SHC 742
- Iltaf Hussain and others vs Federation of Pakistan through Chairman NAB 2022 PCRLJ 1111
- Ahmed Khan Solangi and others vs Chairman, National Accountability 2021 P Cr. L J 1161
- ALLAH MUHAMMAD Versus State 2022 YLRN 180
- Mahendar Kumar and 2 others vs The State 2022 YLR 846
- Ayaz Ahmed Soomro and others vs National Accountability Bureau 2020 P Cr. L J 1273
- Mirchoomal Khatri vs The State 2019 SHC 386
- GULZAR ALI and 3 others vs NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Chairman and others 2020 PLD Sindh 1
- MUHAMMAD HANIF and others vs CHAIRMAN NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY 2019 P Cr. L J 1277
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM Versus State 2020 PCrLJ 31
- IFTIKHAR GADAR Versus State 2018 YLR 869
- GHAZANFAR ALI Versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD 2018 YLRN 293
- JAVED ALI Versus CHAIRMAN NAB 2017 PCrLJN 150
- ASAD ALI Versus State 2017 PCrLJN 118
- ATHAR ALI ABBASI Versus State 2017 PCrLJN 167
- MUREED ABBAS Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2017 PCrLJN 175
- AZIM SHAH vs MIRAJ BIBI and 23 others 2012 MLD 1196
- SHAHID PERVAIZ Versus State 2012 MLD 537
- MINHON KHAN CHANDIO vs NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU Through Director General, Regional National Accountability Bureau 2011 YLR 746
- MUHAMMAD ZAHIR SHAH vs THE STATE 2002 P Cr. L J 683