Pakistan Case Law
2001 C.L.R. 1568

KABIR vs DI LAWAR

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2001 C.L.R. 1568
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 1244 of 2001
Date2001-07-06
Judge(s)Munir A. Sheikh, Abdur Rahman Khan
ResultN/A
Summary

This petition for leave to appeal arises from concurrent findings of the lower courts, which dismissed the plaintiff's suit due to a failure to comply with the legal requirement of Talab-e-Muwathebath. The core legal question before the Supreme Court was whether the petitioner had satisfied the mandatory procedural requirements for the exercise of the right of pre-emption under Islamic law, specifically the performance of Talab-e-Muwathebath. The petitioner's counsel argued that the matter should be heard alongside another pending appeal, asserting that identical legal points were involved. Upon review, the Supreme Court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any error in the lower courts' reasoning regarding the non-compliance with the requisite Talab. Furthermore, the Court rejected the request to consolidate the petition with another case, finding that the cited case lacked factual or legal similarity and would have no bearing on the present matter. Consequently, the Court refused leave to appeal and dismissed the petition, affirming the concurrent judgments of the lower courts.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Is the performance of Talab-e-Muwathebath a mandatory requirement for a valid pre-emption claim?
  • Can a petition for leave to appeal be consolidated with another case if the legal issues are not identical?
pre-emptionTalab-e-Muwathebathleave to appealconcurrent findingsIslamic law

ORDER

1. ABDUR RAHMAN KHAN, J.-- All the Courts have concurred in dismissing the suit of the plaintiff/petitioner on the ground that he has failed to comply with the requirement of Talab-e- Muwathebath. The learned counsel was unable to dislodge any of the reasons enumerated in the impugned judgments for holding that "Talab" had not been made in accordance with law., Learned counsel in the end stated that this petition be heard alongwith an appeal arising from CP-725-L/96 captioned as "Mst. Waziran alias Faiz Ellahi vs. Abdul Sattar etc." as identical points are to be determined in the said appeal. However, we went through the leave granting order and find that, that case has nothing similar with the present case and the decision in that would have no bearing on the discussion of this case. Therefore, leave is refused and the petition is dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.