SARFRAZ KHAN and another vs THE RETURNING OFFICER and anothers
This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal against an order of the Lahore High Court, which dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's nomination papers for the office of Naib Nazim. The Returning Officer had rejected the nomination papers after finding that the petitioner was not a Matriculate, based on discrepancies between the petitioner's statements and the official record from the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Sargodha, including a mismatch in the photograph on the certificate and the subject combination taken. The appellate authority upheld this rejection. The core legal question was whether the High Court could interfere with these findings of fact in its Constitutional jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the arguments raised by the petitioner regarding the genuineness of the certificate and the alleged misplacement of the photograph were essentially questions of fact. Consequently, the Court affirmed that such factual disputes cannot be adjudicated upon in the exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed, and leave to appeal was refused.
- Can the High Court interfere with findings of fact regarding the rejection of nomination papers in its Constitutional jurisdiction?
- Is the determination of a candidate's educational qualification by a Returning Officer a question of fact that precludes judicial review?
ORDER
' SH. RIAZ AHMED, J.---Leave to appeal is sought against the order, dated 19th of December, 2000 whereby a learned Single Judge, of the Lahore High Court dismissed the writ petition of the petitioner in limine calling in question the rejection of his nomination paper for contesting election to the office of Naib Nazim.
2. Petitioner had filed his nomination papers and an objection was raised that he was not a Matriculate. The Returning Officer summoned the relevant record from the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Board of Sargodha and found the name of the petitioner and his parentage on the certificate issued by the Board but the photograph on the forms was that of a different person. The Returning Officer also put a few questions to the petitioner to which he sated that he had taken his examination in Science subjects whereas record revealed that he appeared in Arts subjects. On the basis of this material, the Returning Officer concluded that in fact some body had impersonated the petitioner to take the examination and thus the Returning Officer held the petitioner to be a non-Matriculate and rejected his nomination papers. An appeal was taken against the aforesaid order and the appellate authority also upheld the order of the Returning Officer, and thus the Constitutional jurisdiction of the Lahore High Court was invoked but the writ petition was dismissed in terms of order impugned.
3. Mr. M. Mohy-ud-Din Qazi, Advocate Supreme Court argues that the certificate issued in favour of the petitioner was genuine and it was only the Board who could cancel the certificate. Further states that in fact somebody had misplaced the photograph of the petitioner.
4. The arguments raised by the learned counsel are essentially the questions of fact and the same could not have gone into in exercise of the Constitutional jurisdiction. In this view of the matter, even this Court cannot help the petitioner. Accordingly, we find no substance in this petition and dismiss the same accordingly. Leave to appeal is refused.
Cited by 25 cases
- Ghazi Khan vs Province of Sindh & Others 2025 SHC 712
- Sayed MUHAMMAD ALI Versus SHAHZAD ABDUL RASHEED 2026 CLC 271
- Teerath vs Sht Beena 2024 SHC 1088
- Abdul Majeed Talani vs Province of Sindh & others 2024 SHC 432, 2025 PLD Sindh 19
- Liaquat Khan Jahangiri vs IX Additional District Judge Karachi West & 2024 SHC 546
- ABDUL MAJEED TALANI Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Sindh Prisons Department 2025 PLD 19
- Muhammad Arif & Others vs Federation of Pakistan & Others 2024 SHC 312, 2025 PLC (C.S.) 93
- Ali Tasleem vs Court of IXth Adj, Karachi-East and others 2023 PLJ Karachi 173
- Ghulam Shabir vs 2nd Adj Tando Allahyar & others Sindh High Court 2023 PLJ Karachi 171
- M/s Sino Sindh Resources vs Fed. of Pakistan and Others 2023 SHC 405
- Muhammad Umair & Others vs Federation of Pakistan & Others 2022 SHC 398
- Yaseen Khan & Others vs Insp. General of Sindh Police & Others 2021 SHC 1234
- Umar Rasheed Malik and 32 others vs Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others 2022 PLC (C.S.) 1498
- Allied Bank Limited vs Khudadad Sher & Another 2021 SHC 1156
- Civil Aviation Authority vs Province Of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and 5 others 2021 MLD 1106
- Fazal Nazir Printing Press & Others vs Province of Sindh and others 2021 SHC 116
- Abdul Sattar vs Province of Sindh & Others 2021 SHC 112
- Muhammad Asif Khan vs Cantonment Board Faisal & another 2020 SHC 1260
- Shamim Ahmed Siddiqui & Others vs Province of Sindh & Others 2020 SHC 1258
- Unilever Pakistan Ltd vs Federation of Pakistan & Others 2020 PTD 2052, 2020 SHC 888
- Van Oord Dredging and Marine Contractors B.V. vs Federation of Pakistan 2020 PTD 2008, 2020 SHC 890
- SICPA SA vs Fed. of Pakistan and Others 2020 MLD 2049, 2020 SHC 222
- TOWN COMMITTEE, KOT ABDUL MALIK, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA through Administrator vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through the Secretary, Local Government and Rural Development Department, Punjab, Lahore and another 2001 YLR 1032
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM RANA vs Syed ABUZER HUSNAIN BOKHARI otherss 2006 YLR 1829
- Umar Rasheed Malik & Others vs Federation of Pakistan & Others 2021 SHC 1166