Pakistan Case Law
2001 YLR 2074

ZULFIQUAR JAFFRI vs THE STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2001 YLR 2074
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No,S-386 of 2001
Date2001-07-10
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Soomro
ResultBail granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a post-arrest bail application filed by the applicant, Zulfiqar Jaffri, who was charged under Sections 302, 147, 148, and 149 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860, along with Section 13(d) of the Arms Ordinance, in connection with a murder case. The core legal question was whether the applicant was entitled to bail despite allegations of instigation (Lalkara) and his status as an absconder. The prosecution alleged the applicant instigated the principal accused to kill the victim, Mst. Pirani, following a domestic dispute. The Court held that the applicant was entitled to bail, noting that no specific overt act beyond alleged instigation was attributed to him. Regarding the applicant's abscondence, the Court ruled that while fugitives from justice may lose certain rights, abscondence is not a hard and fast rule for denying bail, especially when no formal proceedings under Sections 87 and 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 had been initiated against the accused. Consequently, the Court granted bail subject to the furnishing of a surety bond.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the absence of proceedings under Sections 87 and 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 mitigate the effect of an accused's abscondence on a bail application?
  • Is an allegation of mere instigation (Lalkara) sufficient to deny bail in a murder case?
  • Does abscondence automatically disentitle an accused from the concession of bail?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 147, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 148, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 149, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 324, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 13(d), Arms Ordinance
  • Section 87, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
  • Section 88, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
post-arrest bailabscondenceinstigationLalkaramurdercriminal procedurebail

ORDER

' By this order I propose to dispose of criminal bail application filed in respect of applicant Zulfiqar Jaffri in a case bearing crime F.I.R. No,28 of 1998 of Police Station Mirpur Buriro for an offence under sections 302, 147, 148 and 149, P.P.C. Read with section 13(d), Arms Ordinance, on 16-9-2000 an application for bail in anticipation of his arrest was moved in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jacobabad but the same was dismissed as withdrawn on 9-12-2000. Thereafter, second bail application being bail after arrest was moved in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jacobabad but the same was also declined by an order, dated 20-2-2001.

' The prosecution story as unfolded in the F.I.R. Is that on 6-5-1998 at 7.45 a.m. Complainant Gulab Din Jaffri appeared at Police Station Mirpur Buriro, District Jacobabad and filed an F.I.R. That on the night of incident at 3-00 a.m. There had been a quarrel in between Abdullah and his wife Mst.

Piriani on delivery of golden ornaments by the latter to the applicant. It has been further alleged that a day before the incident complainant and his son Hussain Bakhsh went to see his daughter Mst. Pirani in her house where Haji Audho, Abdullah, Zulfiqar, Rehman and his brother Dur Muhammad alias Duro were also present. Soon after the exchange of views and after having dinner they went into bed. At about 3-00 a.m. Mid night there had been a quarrel in between Mst.

Pirani and her husband Abdullah alias Bismillah who was found fighting with Mst. Priani on the ground that she is not delivering the golden ornaments to him. At this juncture Zulfiqar,

2. Rehman,

3. Audho,

4. Dur Muhammad came there and instigated Abdullah not to spare his wife Mst. Pirani, as she has refused to hand over the golden ornaments. Abdullah took out his. Gun and within the sight of the complainant and P.Ws., he fired from the same at his wife Mst. Pirani with an intention to kill which hit her and she fell down by raising cries Complainant and his son tried to intervene but the accused in the meanwhile left the house. Mst. Pirani was seen who had sustained fire-arm injury and was unconscious. Leaving Hussain Bakhsh for taking care of the injured Mst. Pirani at the place of occurrence, went to Police Station where he recorded the F.I.R. As above. Initially the report was registered under section 324, P.P.C. Read with other sections but after the death of deceased Mst. Pirani the section was converted into 302, P.P.C. The investigation followed and in due course the applicant was sent up to stand trial in the Court of Sessions Judge, Jacobabad.

' Heard arguments of Mr. Muhammad Ayaz Soomro, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Mushtaq Ahmed Korejo, Advocate for the State. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that as for applicant Zulfiqar Jaffri is concerned according to F.I.R. He was not shown to be armed with any kind of weapon and no role is attributed to him excepting instigation which is always usual in this part of country. Besides this no other overt act is attributed to him. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Korejo appearing on behalf of the State argued that the incident is old of 5-6- 1998 and the applicant was absconder since the date of incident up to 16-9-2000 when he surrendered before the Sessions Judge, Jacobabad for bail before arrest. Learned counsel, however, raised no objection to the grant of bail on the ground that no proceedings under sections 87 and 88, Cr.P.C. Were initiated against the accused.

I have given my anxious consideration to the arguments of the respective parties and perused the record. Admittedly no overt act has been attributed to the present applicant namely Zulfiquar Jaffri excepting a 'Lalkara'. As far the abscondence of applicant is concerned, it has been held time and again that fugitive from law and justice can loose some of the normal rights but it cannot be taken as hard and fast rule and every case has to be decided on its own facts and circumstances. Since no proceedings under sections 87 and 88, Cr.P.C. Were initiated against the applicant, I am of the view that the abscondence is not such by which the applicant could be disentitled from the concession of bail. In the light of above I enlarge applicant Zulfiqar Jaffri to bail in the sum of Rs,2,00,000 (Rupees two lacs) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.