CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT EVACUEE TRUST, JHELUM vs ABDUL KHALIQ through Legal Heirs and others
This petition for leave to appeal was filed by the Chairman, District Evacuee Trust, Jhelum, challenging a Lahore High Court judgment that dismissed a Settlement Appeal. The petition was barred by 32 days. The Supreme Court of Pakistan addressed the recurring issue of government departments and autonomous bodies filing legal proceedings beyond the prescribed limitation period and seeking condonation of delay based on internal departmental processes. The Court held that no preferential treatment can be offered to government departments or autonomous bodies, and their cases must be treated in the same manner as those of ordinary litigants. Condonation of delay can only be granted upon showing sufficient grounds acceptable under the law. The Court emphasized that where a government case is dismissed on limitation, departmental heads must initiate action against the delinquent officers responsible for the delay to prevent losses to the public exchequer. Ultimately, the Chairman of the Evacuee Trust Property Board conceded that the property did not belong to the department, leading to the dismissal of the petition on both limitation and lack of cause of action.
- Whether government departments or autonomous bodies are entitled to preferential treatment or a different standard of scrutiny regarding the law of limitation compared to ordinary litigants?
- Can internal departmental proceedings or administrative delays serve as a sufficient ground for the condonation of delay in filing legal proceedings?
- What recourse should be taken against government officers whose negligence or delay in filing appeals results in cases being barred by limitation?
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.---This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 14th November, 2000 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore, whereby Settlement Appeal filed by Chairman, District Evcuee Trust, Jhelum has been dismissed.
2. This petition is barred by 32 days. On the last date of hearing notice was ordered to be issued to Chairman, Evacuee Trust Property Board, to look into the matter personally and conduct and through probe into it and fix responsibility upon the person responsible for causing delay in filing of petition.
3 . In response to notice Chairman, Evacuee Trust Board, Lahore appeared in person and placed on record a copy of his statement indicating action taken by him against the delinquent officers. He further stated that in future there will be no lapse on behalf of the Board in filing petitions/appeals.
4. It has been pointed out number of times that cases pertaining to Federal/Provincial Government or autonomous bodies instituted beyond limitation prescribed by law before subordinate Court, High Court and this Court without assigning any justification acceptable under the law for not approaching the Court within time and in the applications seeking condonation of delay, if filed, invariably the plea is taken that time has been spent in completion of departmental proceedings, therefore, delay may be condoned. The concerned department must know that delay of limitation in tiling of proceedings can only be condoned if it is sought for on sufficient grounds otherwise in absence thereof no special indulgence can be shown to such department because it is well- settled that no preferential treatment can be offered to the Government department or autonomous bodies. Their cases have to be dealt with same manner as the cases of an ordinary litigant/citizen. In this behalf, reliance is placed on Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad through Collector of Customs, Sialkot Dry Port, Samberial, District Sialkot and others v. Messrs Raja Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. Through General Manager and 3 others (1998 SCM R 307), Lahore High Court, Lahore through Registrar v. Nazar Muhammad Fatima and others 1998 SCM R 2376, Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 5 others v.
Jamaluddin and others 1996 SCM R 727, Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Messrs Azhar Brothers Ltd. 1990 SCM R 1059 and Government of the Punjab through Secretary (Services), Services General Administration and information Department, Lahore and another v. Muhammad Saleem PLD 1995 SC 396.
5. We are conscious that on declining relief either to the Government or public litigant in view of the provision of limitation, serious, injustice is caused to either of the party before the Court but we cannot help it in view of the existing law. However, concerning the cases belonging to the Government/autonomous bodies, at least one thing can be done that if case is decided against it on the question of limitation, the direction must be passed to the high-ups of the department so he/they may initiate departmental action against those officers who are directly or indirectly responsible for causing delay in instituting the cases beyond period of limitation and even in absence of such directions, it would be duty of such officer to take action accordingly because if such unscrupulous persons are not proceeded against, they will have no fear of causing huge losses to the Government/autonomous functionaries at the cost of public exchequer because ultimately it is the public at large who suffers, being ultimate beneficiaries of the Government property.
6. We appreciate the steps taken by the incumbent Chairman of Evacuee Trust Property Board, Lahore for initiating actions against the officers who are responsible for filing instant petition beyond period of limitation and we are hopeful that in future other responsible officers would also do so.
7. The Chairman, Evacuee Trust Property Board candidly conceded that instant petition should not have been filed by his department because the property in question does not belong to it. In view of his such statement, petition is dismissed both for want of cause of action as well as being barred by limitation. Copy of this judgment be 'sent to the Chairman, Evacuee Trust Property Board, Lahore.
Cited by 28 cases
- The Province of Punjab through Secretary, Sports & Youth Affairs 2025 LHC 794
- The Province of Punjab through Secretary, Sports and Youth Affairs Department Lahore Versus Sabir Ali , Rana Shamshad Khan 2026 YLR 178
- M/s. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited vs M/s. Bhatti Fabrics etc. 2024 LHC 3160
- Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad, Afiya Shehrbano Zia and others vs Supreme Judicial Council through its Secretary, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad and others 2024 SCP 101, 2024 PLD Supreme Court 698
- Regional Police Officer, Dera Ghazi Khan Region, etc vs Riaz Hussain 2023 SCP 323, 2024 SCMR 1021
- The Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary 2023 PHC 143
- Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary and 5 others 2023 YLR 2556
- Director of Customs Valuation vs M/s. Hanna Dairies, I-301 2022 SHC 304
- The Director of Customs Valuation through Additional Director Directorate 2023 PTD 68
- The Director of Customs Valuation through Additional Director Directorate PTCL 2023 CL 322
- The Collector Of Customs through Additional Collector of Customs vs Messrs Dream Garments 2021 PTD 1042
- Province of Sindh and others vs Messrs Parkock Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd. 2020 PLD Sindh 136
- (Mian Muhammad Sharif) M/s Syed Ibrar Hussain Naqvi Advocate, A.K. 2015 LHC 4748
- Mian Muhammad Sharif vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lahore 2015 LHC 4748, 2015 P.T.C.L.R. 1213
- Mian MUHAMMAD SHARIF vs INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2016 PTD 296
- FESCO/WAPDA through Chief Executive Officer and 3 others vs PUNJAB 2017 PLC 249
- PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer (Revenue) Bhakkar and anothers vs NOOR MUHAMMAD and 3 otherss 2016 MLD 1787
- WAPDA through Chairman and 5 others vs Messrs KHAN COTTON GINNING 2021 KLR Revenue Cases 59, 2014 MLD 1639
- THE STATE/NAB through Chairman vs SIKANDAR ALI JATOI 2011 P Cr. L J 1057
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, PESHAWAR vs ZABEEL PALACE HOTEL, PESHAWAR 2011 SCMR 361
- GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Works and another vs Messrs MALBROW BUILDERS, CONTRACTOR, SIALKOT 2006 SCMR 1248
- DISTRICT COUNCIL (District Govt.) vs Ch. MUHAMMAD YASIN etc. 2006 PLJ Lahore 790
- District Council vs Chaudhry Muhammad Yasin and others 2006 C.L.R. 306
- DISTRICT COUNCIL, FAISALABAD through District Coordination Officer vs Ch. 2006 YLR 440
- GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Works, Islamabad and anothers vs Messrs MALBROW BUILDERS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS through Partner 2006 YLR 3000
- CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and others vs MUHAMMAD SHARIF JAVAID WARSI 2003 PLD Supreme Court 6
- ASHIQ HUSSAIN SHAH vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector District, Attock and 6 others 2003 SCMR 1840
- GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through MINISTRY OF WORKS and another vs M_s. MALBROW BUILDERS, CONTRACTOR SIALKOT 2006 PLJ SC 884