Pakistan Case Law
2002 C.L.R. 518

Department, Lahore and others vs MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2002 C.L.R. 518
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 572-L of 2001
Date2001-07-17
Judge(s)Muhammad Arif, Qazi Muhammad Farooq, Sh. Riaz Ahmed
ResultPetition dismissed.
Summary

This matter comes before the Supreme Court of Pakistan on a petition for leave to appeal against the order dated 5.12.2000 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore in Appeal No. 1201 of 1999, which had dismissed the respondent's appeal challenging the termination of his services on the ground of being barred by time. The core legal question concerns whether the service tribunal's dismissal of the appeal on limitation grounds warrants interference by the apex court. The Supreme Court held that no question of public importance was involved in the petition and declined to interfere with the impugned judgment. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused, laying down the principle that the Supreme Court will not interfere with service tribunal orders on limitation unless a question of public importance is raised.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the Supreme Court will grant leave to appeal against an order of the Service Tribunal dismissing an appeal as barred by time when no question of public importance is involved?
service appeallimitationtime barredtermination of serviceleave to appealpublic importance

1. On appeal from the order dated 5.12.2000 of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore passed in Appeal No. 1201/1999

ORDER

2. SH. RIAZ AHMED, J. -- Leave to appeal is sought against the order dated 5.12.2000 whereby the appeal of the respondent calling in question termination of his services was dismissed by Punjab Service Tribunal as barred by time. We have gone through the judgment impugned and heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In our view no question of public importance is involved in this petition, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the judgment impugned. Petition is dismissed and leave to appeal refused accordingly.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.