Mst. NAJAM-UN-NISA vs JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT CONSTITUTED UNDER ANTI-
This petition for leave to appeal challenged the jurisdiction of a Special Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, to try a criminal case involving the murder of seven individuals. The petitioner argued that the case did not fall within the ambit of the Anti-Terrorism Act and should instead be tried by a court of ordinary plenary jurisdiction. The Supreme Court addressed the core question of what factors determine whether a crime falls under the Anti-Terrorism Act. The Court held that the venue, time, motive, or public witnessing of a crime are not the sole determinants of jurisdiction. Instead, the crucial test is whether the crime has the effect of striking terror or creating a sense of fear and insecurity among the people or a section thereof. Finding that the brutal murder of seven persons in a single incident inherently creates such terror and horror, the Court upheld the decisions of the Special Court and the Lahore High Court, dismissing the petition and refusing leave to appeal.
- What is the crucial test for determining whether a crime falls within the parameters of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997?
- Are the venue, time, and motive of a crime the sole factors for determining if a case is triable by a Special Court under the Anti-Terrorism Act?
- Does the brutal murder of multiple persons in a single incident constitute an act that creates terror or fear among the public?
- sections 302/109/148/149, P.P.C.
- sections 6/7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997
ORDER
' KHAL1L-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.---In an occurrence which had allegedly taken place on 18-9-2001 at about TAHAJJAD WELA in the area of Police Station Sabzi Mandi Gujranwala, 7 persons had been gunned down at the Dera of Muhammad Ahsan complainant. A case bearing F.I.R. No,457, dated 18-9-2001 was consequently registered at the abovementioned Police Station under sections 302/109/ 148/149, P.P.C. As per the record the provisions of sections 6/7 of the. Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997 were subsequently added which made the case triable by a Special Court under the said Act of 1997.
2. The petitioner herein who is also one of the accused persons of the said case submitted an application before a learned Special Judge under the ATA of 1997 at Gujranwala questioning his jurisdiction to try the case in question on the ground that the said case did not fall within the ambit of ATA of 1997 and consequently prayed that the trial in question be sent to the ordinary Court of plenary jurisdiction. This application was dismissed on 22-3-2002 which led the petitioner to the filing of a Writ Petition No,5198 of 2002 in the Lahore High Court which petition was also dismissed by a learned Division Bench through an order, dated 1-4-2002. Hence this petition.
3. The venue of the commission of a crime; the time of occurrence, the motive which had led to the commission of a crime and the fact whether the said crime had or had not been witnessed by the public at large are not the only factors determining the issue whether a case did or did not fall within the parameters of the ATA of 1997. The crucial question is whether the said crime had or had not the effect of striking terror or creating a sense of fear and insecurity in the people or any section of the people. Needless to mention here that a crime of the kind in hand committed even in a remote corner does not remain unnoticed in the area in which is committed or even in the country on account of the print and electronic media. Seven persons being butchered in a house at night is not the kind of occurrence which would not create terror and horror in the people or any section of the people.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner we do not find any factual or legal infirmity in the orders passed by the learned Special Judge or the order passed by the Lahore High Court. This petition is therefore dismissed and leave refused.
Cited by 22 cases
- Ghulam Hussain vs The State, etc 2020 PLD Supreme Court 61, PLJ 2020 SC (Cr.C.) 1, 2019 PSC CRI 969, 2019
- TARIQ ALI JATOI Versus State 2022 YLRN 137
- NAZAR MUHAMMAD and another vs The STATE 2015 NLR Civil 580, 2015 PLJ Islamabad 133, 2019 YLR 1260
- Malik TARIQ AYUB and another vs STATE and 6 others 2019 PLJ Islamabad 1
- ABDUL AZIZ vs MUHAMMAD PUNHAL and 2 others 2017 MLD 1321
- MUHAMMAD RASHID a Master and another vs The STATE 2017 PLD Sindh 387
- JAVED IQBAL and another vs The STATE 2015 P Cr. L J 438
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF vs SAGEER AHMED alias BHAYA and another 2015 P Cr. L J 611
- SHERAL vs SAJAN Alias SAJOO And 17 Others 2011 YLR 2929
- BASHIR AHMED vs MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and others 2009 PLD Supreme Court 11
- MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE vs MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and 3 others 2008 PLD Karachi 260
- ZAHID IMRAN and others vs STATE 2006 PLJ SC 701
- ZAHID IMRAN and others vs THE STATE and others 2006 PLD Supreme Court 109
- Mian MUHAMMAD GHAFOOR vs STATE and 3 others 2005 PLJ Peshawar 159
- Mian MUHAMMAD GHAFOOR vs THE STATE and 3 others 2005 YLR 2483
- Mirza SHAUKAT BAIGand others/Petitioners vs SHAHID JAMILand others 2005 PLD Supreme Court 530
- AMIR KHAN vs THE STATE 2005 PLD Karachi 344
- GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB vs SPECIAL JUDGE, A.T.A., COURT No.2, MULTAN and 4 others 2004 YLR 3157
- GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB vs SPECIAL JUDGE A.T.A COURT NO. II, MULTAN and 4 others 2005 PLJ Lahore 1217
- BASHARAT ALI vs SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT-II, GUJRANWALA 2004 PLD Lahore 199
- Sheral vs Sajan alias Sajoo and others
- BASHARAT ALI vs SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT-II, GUJRANWALA 2004 PLJ Lahore 795