WAZIR MUHAMMAD vs The STATE
This criminal appeal arises from the case of Wazir Muhammad v. The State, wherein the Supreme Court of Pakistan considered the propriety of withholding post-arrest bail from the appellant. The core legal question revolved around whether an accused charged solely with making a lalkara (instigatory call), without any attributed overt act, is entitled to bail. The Court held that the appellant deserved to be released on bail given the absence of any overt act ascribed to him. The ratio decidendi established is that where an accused is only charged with a lalkara and no specific overt act is attributed in the commission of the crime, a case for further inquiry is made out, warranting the grant of post-arrest bail. The appeal was accordingly accepted and the appellant directed to be released on furnishing suitable sureties.
- Is an accused charged only with lalkara entitled to post-arrest bail when no overt act is ascribed to him?
- Whether the absence of an overt act in a criminal charge warrants the release of the accused on bail?
ORDER
1. QAISAR KHAN, J.-The facts of the case are narrated in the order dated the 9th of May 1978 of this Court granting leave to appeal and need not be reiterated.
2. After hearing Mr. Muhammad Masood Kausar, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Amir Zada Khan, learned Assistant Advocate-General, N.-W. F. P. We have come to the conclusion that the appellant deserves to be released on bail. He has only been charged for lalkara and no overt act has been ascribed to him. Under the circumstances we therefore accept this appeal and order that he be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the like amount to the satisfaction of the Illaqa Magistrate.
Cited by 5 cases
- Ghulam Akbar vs The State 2020 SHC 1248
- Rooh-ul-Amin & another vs The State & another 2020 PHC 274
- ROOH-UL-AMIN Versus State 2021 YLRN 65
- WAZIR KHAN Versus Rana MUHAMMAD AKBAR 1988 MLD 53
- Haji AURANGZEB vs TAE STATE 1979 PLD Quetta 148