Pakistan Case Law
2004 PLC (C.S.) 962

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI and another vs MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE SIDDIQUI

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2004 PLC (C.S.) 962
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Judge(s)Nazirn Hussain Siddiqui and Abdul Hameed Dogar
ResultLeave Refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition filed by the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and another impugning the judgment of the Sindh Service Tribunal, Karachi, which had allowed an appeal filed by the respondent Muhammad Rafique Siddiqui. The petition was admittedly time-barred by 38 days, and the petitioners sought condonation of delay on the ground that instructions from the concerned authority were delayed. The core legal question addressed by the Supreme Court was whether departmental delays and the completion of internal bureaucratic formalities constitute sufficient grounds for condoning a delay in filing an appeal by the government. The Supreme Court held that the government cannot be treated differently from an ordinary litigant on questions of limitation, and that completion of administrative formalities is not a sufficient ground for condoning delay. The key principle laid down is that the government is bound by the laws of limitation in the same manner as any private litigant, and administrative delays in obtaining instructions do not constitute a satisfactory explanation for condoning delay.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the government can be treated differently from an ordinary litigant on the question of limitation?
  • Does the delay in receiving instructions from a concerned authority constitute a sufficient ground for condoning delay in filing an appeal?
  • Is the completion of internal bureaucratic formalities considered a satisfactory explanation for condoning a time-barred petition?
limitationcondonation of delayservice appealgovernment as litiganttime-barred petition

' NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, J---The petitioners have impugned the judgment dated 4-10-2001 of learned Sindh Service Tribunal, Karachi whereby the Appeal No,165-2000 preferred by respondent, Muhammad Rafique Siddiqui, was allowed.

2. Admittedly, the petition is time-barred by 38 days. The condonation of delay is sought on the ground that instructions from the concerned authority for filing appeal were not received in time and for that reason the petition could not be filed within time. It is settled law that on question of limitation the Government could not be treated differently from ordinary litigant. Completion of formalities is not a sufficient ground for condoning such delay. On above point, reference can be made to the cases reported as (1) Federation of Pakistan v. Jamaluddin and others (1996 SCM R 727), (2) Central Board of Revenue, v. Raja Industries (1998 SCM R 307) and (3) Pakistan Coast Guards v. Shareef Ahmed (2000 SCJ 586).

3. Since delay has not been explained satisfactorily, the leave to appeal is refused and the petition is dismissed.

Cited by 4 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.