Pakistan Case Law
2004 SCMR 1358

KARAM DIN vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, Mianwali and others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2004 SCMR 1358
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No, 935-L of 1999
Date2002-05-15
Judge(s)Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar
Authored byIftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry
ResultPetition dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition for leave to appeal was filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan with a delay of 18 days. The petitioner sought condonation of this delay, citing personal indisposition as the sole ground for the late filing. However, the petitioner failed to append any medical certificate or supporting documentation to substantiate the claim of illness. Upon inquiry by the Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner candidly conceded that, in the absence of a medical certificate, the plea of indisposition could not be legally entertained or substantiated. Consequently, the Court held that the delay could not be condoned due to the lack of evidence supporting the petitioner's inability to file the petition within the prescribed period of limitation. The Court affirmed the principle that a plea for condonation of delay based on medical grounds must be supported by credible documentary evidence, such as a medical certificate, to be considered valid. Finding no sufficient cause for the delay, the petition was dismissed as time-barred.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a delay in filing a petition be condoned on the ground of indisposition without the production of a medical certificate?
  • Is a petition liable to be dismissed if it is filed beyond the period of limitation and the application for condonation of delay lacks supporting evidence?
condonation of delaylimitationtime-barred petitionmedical certificatesufficient cause

ORDER

IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.---This petition is barred by 18 days.

2. An application has been filed seeking condonation of delay on the ground that the petitioner was indisposed. However.No medical certificate has been appended with this application. We asked the learned counsel for petitioner to explain as to how in absence of medical certificate, we can entertain the plea of petitioner. He candidly concededthat in absence of medical certificate, plea of petitioner being indisposed cannot be entertained.

In view of the above situation, we are of the opinion that in absence of medical certificate we cannot entertain the plea of petitioner being indisposed, therefore, delay in filing of petition cannot be condoned. As such petition is dismissed being barred by time.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.