Mian MUHAMMAD AFZAL vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others
This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal against a Lahore High Court judgment that dismissed a writ petition challenging the 25-year maximum age limit imposed for admission to medical colleges in Punjab. The petitioner contended that his academic qualifications created a vested right to admission, which the age restriction infringed upon. The Supreme Court of Pakistan examined the challenge and held that the petitioner did not acquire a vested right to admission in an M.B.B.S. course merely by completing F.Sc. with Biology and Science subjects. Furthermore, the Court determined that educational authorities are not debarred from prescribing maximum age limits for admission, as this constitutes an administrative policy decision. The Court affirmed that superior courts are generally reluctant to interfere in such policy matters. Relying on the precedent established in Sultana Khokhar versus The University of the Punjab (PLD 1962 SC 35), the Court concluded that the petition lacked merit and dismissed it, upholding the authority of the government to set admission criteria.
- Does completing F.Sc. with Biology and Science subjects create a vested right to admission in an M.B.B.S. course?
- Are educational authorities empowered to prescribe a maximum age limit for admission to medical colleges?
- Should superior courts interfere with administrative policy decisions regarding admission criteria for educational institutions?
ORDER
' RANA BHAGWANDAS, J.---The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment, dated 31-12- 2001 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dismissing Writ Petition No,21740 of 2001 filed by him.
2. Petitioner impugned the condition fixing 25 years as the maximum age limit for a candidate to seek admission in the Medical Colleges of Punjab in the latest Prospectus but he was non-suited, hence this petition for leave to appeal.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and examined the impugned order which enunciated correct position of law. Petitioner by getting admission in F.Sc with Biology and Science subjects neither A acquired any vested right to admission in M.B.B.S. Nor were the authorities debarred from prescribing maximum age limit for admission to such course of studies. This is purely an administrative matter relating to policy decision of the Government with which the superior Courts are always reluctant to interfere. In our view, there is no merit in this petition and the High Court has rightly referred to the dictum of this Court in Sultana Khokhar versus The University of the Punjab, through its Registrar (PLD 1962 SC 35), which clinches the issue under controversy.
4. Resultantly, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.
Cited by 17 cases
- MUHAMMAD IRSHAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2026 PLC(CS) 86
- Hafsa Habib Qureshi, Taha Shah and others vs Amir Hamza and others 2023 SCP 388, 2024 PLD Supreme Court 780
- Union Fabrics Private Limited and others vs Federation of Pakistan through Chairman, Economic Co-ordination Committee, Islamabad and others 2023 PLD Sindh 270
- MUHAMMAD TAYYAB Versus The VICE-CHANCELLOR/CHAIRMAN ADMISSION COMMITTEE (BUMHS) 2022 YLRN 60
- Maham Jahangir vs Government of Punjab, etc 2019 PLJ Lahore 42, 2018 KLR Civil Cases 322
- MAHAM JAHANGIR Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2018 CLCN 80
- Muhammad Fahad Malik vs Pakistan Medical and Dental Council etc. 2017 LHC 3892
- MUHAMMAD FAHAD MALIK vs PAKISTAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL and others 2018 PLD Lahore 75
- Muhammad Fahad Malik vs Pakistan Medical and Dental Council, etc. 2018 KLR Civil Cases 116
- Hafiz Junaid Mahmood vs Govt. of Punjab, etc. 2016 LHC 3573
- Hafiz JUNAID MAHMOOD vs GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others 2017 PLJ Lahore 187, 2017 PLD Lahore 1
- Hafiz Junaid Mahmood vs Govt. of Punjab, etc 2018 [M] C.L.R. 470
- SECRETARY ECONOMIC AFFAIRS DIV, ISLAMABAD & others vs ANWARUL HAQ 2013 SCMR 1687, 2013 PLJ SC 850
- SECRETARY ECONOMIC AFFAIRS DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and others vs ANWARUL HAQ AHMED and others 2013 SCMR 1687
- AROOSA NAWAZ & 7 others vs AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad & 61 others 2014 PLJ SC (AJ&K) 133
- Aroosa Nawaz d_o Shahnawaz Khan r_o Shalabagh, Tehsil & District Muz_48236349 2014-SC AJK-11
- PRINCIPAL/EO, FATIMA JINNA H MEDICAL COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, LAHORE vs 2014 NLR Civil 339