Mst. RAZIA BIBI vs RIAZ AHMAD and another
This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal against a High Court judgment that had granted custody of a minor child to the father, reversing an appellate court's decision in favor of the mother. The core legal question was whether the father's superior financial status and urban residence outweighed the mother's continuous care and the child's established welfare in determining custody. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring custody to the mother. The Court held that poverty is not a valid ground to deprive a mother of custody, particularly when she has continuously cared for the child. The Court emphasized that the welfare of the minor is the paramount consideration. It noted that the father's failure to provide maintenance, his second marriage, and the potential hardship of placing the child under a step-mother in the presence of a devoted natural mother were critical factors. The principle laid down is that while financial means are relevant, they do not override the welfare of the minor, and a mother's poverty cannot be used to disentitle her from custody.
- Does a mother's poverty or lack of financial resources automatically disentitle her from the custody of her minor child?
- Is a father's failure to provide maintenance a relevant factor in determining the welfare of the minor for custody purposes?
- Can a father's second marriage be considered a factor when determining the custody of a minor child in the presence of the natural mother?
- Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890
ORDER
1. ' TANVIR AHMED KHAN, J.-Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment dated 21-3-2000, whereby a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur, accepted Writ Petition No,1965 of 1999 filed by respondent No,1 and allowed him the custody of the child.
2. ' The facts briefly narrated for the disposal of this petition are that the parties entered into a marriage contract on 7-4-1989 in accordance with the Islamic rites. A son named Ijaz Ahmad was born on 10-4-1990-out of the said wedlock. Immediately thereafter relations between the parties became strained, whereupon the petitioner lady was forced by the circumstances to leave her matrimonial house alongwith her minor son. Thereafter the respondent divorced her on 15-4-1997.
3. The petitioner filed an application under section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before the learned Guardian Judge, Bahawalnagar, seeking custody of her minor son. The plea taken by the respondent was that he was living in an urban area while the petitioner lady, being an illiterate, was putting up in a village having poor atmosphere. The learned Guardian Judge through his judgment dated 24-6-1998 accepted the petition simply on the ground that the respondent father had got better facilities and had not contracted second marriage.
4. ' The petitioner filed an appeal assailing the aforesaid judgment of the trial Court, which was accepted by the learned Additional District'Judge, Bahawalnagar, vide his judgment dated 18-1- 1999 by reversing the determination of the learned Guardian Judge who handed over the custody of the minor to his mother. The respondent preferred aforesaid writ petition before the Lahore High Court at Bahawalpur Bench, which has been accepted by a learned Single Judge through his judgment dated 21-3-2000, impugned herein. Hence, this petition for leave to appeal.
5. 'We have considered the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the entire document annexed with petition. None has come forward from the respondent's side in spite of service of notice, as such he is proceeded ex parte. It is reflected from the perusal thereof that minor Ijaz Ahmad was born on 10-4-1990 and by now he is 13 years of age.
6. The learned Single Judge of the Lahore- High Court has been mainly swayed by the so-called better facilities enjoyed by the respondent disentitling the petitioner lady from the custody of the minor. It is to be noted for all concerned that poverty on the part of a lady is no ground to disentitle her from the custody of the minor. The petitioner lady has been looking after her minor son since his birth and maintaining him in a good environment. The father, who is under the law to maintain his child, has not provided any maintenance till date. The minor is living since his birth with his mother and welfare of the child, in the circumstances, also lies in favour of the petitioner. It is true that non-maintenance on the part of the father would not automatically disentitle him from the custody of his child but this would be one of the circumstances for determining the welfare of the minor. This certainly shows the conduct of the respondent and in the case in hand, as already stated, right from the birth of the child the respondent has not maintained his son. The respondent, as stated by the learned counsel, has contracted second marriage and the mother, on the contrary, has not contracted second marriage. She is devoting her complete attention towards the upbringing of her minor son. Furthermore, it would be harsh at this juncture to hand over the custody of the minor to the respondent leaving him at the mercy of the step-mother in presence of his real mother who is properly maintaining him.
7. ' Resultantly, for what has been stated above, the instant petition is converted into appeal and is allowed. The impugned judgment dated 21-3-2000 of the learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore is set aside. However, there will be no order as to costs.
Cited by 23 cases
- ZULEKHA Versus MUHAMMAD NABI 2026 CLC 92
- Asjad Ullah vs Mst. Asia Bano and others 2025 SCP 156, 2025 PLJ SC 307
- ASJAD ULLAH Versus Mst. ASIA BANO 2025 PLD 541
- Mst. Robina Iqbal vs Additional District Judge etc 2024 LHC 5708
- Gul Sadem Khan vs Mst. Halima and others 2024 SCP 395, 2025 PLD Supreme Court 47
- GUL SADEM KHAN Versus Mst. HALIMA 2025 PLD 47
- Dr. Muhammad Asif vs ADJ Layyah, etc 2024 LHC 2704, 2024 CLC 1520
- Muhammad Jan vs Mst. Faiza & others 2023 SHC 216
- Mirza Waqar Ahmad etc vs Ayesha Zeeshan, etc 2023 LHC 965
- Mirza WAQAR AHMED and others vs AYESHA ZEESHAN and others 2023 MLD 1000
- Saima Nazir vs Guardian Judge (IV), Lahore and another 2023 LHC 354
- SAIMA NAZIR Versus GUARDIAN JUDGE (IV), LAHORE 2023 PLD 433
- Mst. Sadaf Rasheed vs Senior Civil Judge and others 2023 PLD Lahore 412
- Mst. Sadaf Rasheed vs Senior Civil Judge, etc 2023 LHC 2265
- Mst. FOZIA TASLEEM Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHANEWAL 2023 MLD 218
- Mst. Nazia daughter of Aijaz Ali by caste Ghunio vs Naveed Ahmed son of Israr Ahmed by caste Sadhayo 2020 SHC 1084
- Mst. Nazia Ghunio vs Naveed Ahmed Sadhayo and Others 2022 CLC 1829
- Mst. Tahmina Ansari vs Rafique Ahmed alias Gulzar Lakho and 3 others 2021 YLR 1194
- Mir Bat Khan vs Mst. Sherin Bibi and others PLJ 2020 SC (Cr.C.) 175, 2019 SCP 34
- Hafiz SALEEM AKBAR vs UZMA KANWAL 2015 YLR 2650
- Syed RAZA ABBAS vs Mst. SANA SAEED SATTAR and 2 others 2015 YLR 489
- IMRAN BUTT vs MEHREEN IMRAN and another 2015 CLC 1209
- MUMTAZ ALI vs Mst. SALMA and others 2006 CLC 1606