Pakistan Case Law
2004 SCMR 218

MUHAMMAD AKRAM vs MUHAMMAD HALEEM alias HAMAYUN and others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2004 SCMR 218
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No,97 of 2002
Date2002-05-27
Judge(s)Hamid Ali Mirza and Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan
Authored byHamid Ali Mirza
ResultCase remanded
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This criminal petition for leave to appeal is directed against the order of the Lahore High Court dismissing the petitioner's criminal revision against the trial court's order separating the trial of respondent Muhammad Haleem under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. The petitioner had registered a case under sections 302, 364, and 109 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 regarding the murder and abduction of his son. During proceedings, the respondent moved an application claiming minority under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. The trial court held an inquiry and directed a separate charge-sheet for trial before the Juvenile Court, which order was upheld by the High Court. The Supreme Court of Pakistan examined the record and remanded the case to the Sessions Judge/Juvenile Court to redetermine the age of the respondent in terms of section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, after allowing parties to lead further evidence and hear legal pleas, ensuring trial by the competent forum in accordance with law.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the trial of a juvenile accused is required to be separated for trial before a Juvenile Court under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000?
  • How is the age of an accused to be redetermined under section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000?
  • Can a case be remanded to the trial court for a fresh determination of the accused's age and a proper inquiry after allowing parties to lead further evidence?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 364, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 109, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 190(3), Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
  • Section 4(4), Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000
  • Section 7, Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000
Juvenile Justice System OrdinanceDetermination of ageSeparation of trialCriminal petitionRemand of caseJuvenile Court

' HAMID ALI MIRZA, J.---This criminal petition for leave to appeal is directed against the order dated 16-1-2002 passed by learned Judge in Chambers of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench in Criminal Revision No,73 of 2001 (Muhammad Akram v. Muhammad Haleem) passed by learned Judge in Chambers of the Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi, whereby the said revision was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner got registered F.I.R. No,99 dated 10-4-2000, under sections 302/364/109, P.P.C. At Police Station Kahuta, District Rawalpindi, regarding the murder and abduction of his son namely Naveed Anjum against the respondents Nos.1 and 2 and charge-sheet in respect of the case was sent by the concerned Magistrate under section 190(3), Cr.P.C. To Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi, who passed on the same for trial to the Additional Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi. On 1-7-2001 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance) came into force, therefore respondent Muhammad Haleem moved an application before the trial Court under section 4(4) of the said Ordinance stating therein that his case would fall under the provisions Of the said Ordinance, therefore, the trial of his case be separated so that he be tried before the Juvenile Court having jurisdiction as he cannot be tried before the ordinary Court of law. Learned trial Court, after holding an enquiry without holding ossification test found that Muhammad Haleem was under eighteen years of age at the time of occurrence, therefore he directed the police to prepare a separate charge-sheet of the said respondent/accused's case for trial before the Juvenile Court. The petitioner Muhammad Akram preferred Criminal Revision No,73 of2001 before the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench which was heard by learned Judge in Chambers and dismissed as per impugned judgment.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties, State counsel and perused the record.

4. After hearing at length, learned counsel for the parties, we, in the interest of justice and legal pleas raised, so as to avoid future complications in the trial of case, remand the case to the learned Sessions Judge/Juvenile Court, Rawalpindi to redetermine the age of respondent Muhammad Haleem son of Muhammad Arbi in terms of section 7 of Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 after allowing the parties to lead further evidence if it is so desired and hearing them on all legal pleas to be raised and on finding arrived at, the said respondent/accused be tried by competent forum in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Cited by 9 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.