Latest Judgments

Newly reported judgments from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the High Courts and tribunals, added as they are processed — free, full text, updated daily. Judgments marked NEW were added in the most recent update. 232594 judgments in total.

• UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Versus The DIRECTOR/HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD Ali Ibrahim , Shafiq-ur-Rehman2025 CLD 903 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-11-18Read full judgment →
• The UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED Versus The HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD Ali Ibrahim , Shafiq-ur-Rehman2025 CLD 872 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2025-01-01Read full judgment →
• ZULTEC (PRIVATE) LIMITED Versus DIRECTOR/HOD, ONSITE DEPARTMENT, SECP M. Javed Panni2025 CLD 1918 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-01-31Read full judgment →
• INTEGRATED EQUITIES LIMITED Versus DIRECTOR (ADJUDICATION-I), ADJUDICATION DIVISION Imran Anjum Alvi , Hammad Javed2025 CLD 1894 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-02-13Read full judgment →
• HAROON IQBAL Versus COMMISSIONER, SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION, SECP Syed Muhammad Abbas Hyder, Syed Muhammad Raza and Muhammad Hanif German , Hammad Javed2025 CLD 1866 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-07-01Read full judgment →
• EFU GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INSURANCE-SECP Rashid Sadiq and Azeem Rashid , Raja Farruk Ahmad2025 CLD 1621 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2023-10-04Read full judgment →
• NASIR ALI Versus COMMISSIONER INSURANCE Nemo , Shafiq ur Rehman2025 CLD 1537 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-03-20Read full judgment →
• MEEZAN BANK LIMITED Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ADJUDICATION DEPARTMENT-I) SECP, ISLAMABAD Sajjad Ali (Legal Counsel) , Mohammad Akram2025 CLD 1524 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-05-02Read full judgment →
• HASEEB WAQAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED Versus HEAD OF DEPARTMENT/ED-CSD, CLD, SECP Hasham Ahmad Khan2025 CLD 1453 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2023-11-03Read full judgment →
• TAKAFUL PAKISTAN LIMITED Versus The DIRECTOR (INSURANCE) INSURANCE DIVISION, SECP Muhammad Hassan Abbas , Shafiq-ur-Rehman2025 CLD 1309 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-06-03Read full judgment →
• FIRST NATIONAL EQUITIES LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD) Arslan Tahir , Mehboob Ahmad2025 CLD 1256 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2025-01-31Read full judgment →
• AGRITECH LIMITED Versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Ms. Rabia Hassan , Asif Iqbal2025 CLD 1236 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2023-11-14Read full judgment →
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN Versus COMMISSIONER INSURANCE Waqas Asad Sheikh , Hammad Javed2024 CLD 1403 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2023-09-15Read full judgment →
• SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ADJUDICATION-I, SECP, ISLAMABAD Nadeem Ahmad and Ms. Nida Zafar , Mehboob Ahmed2024 CLD 1095 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2024-01-20Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD IRFAN, CEO MIKON SECURITIES (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET\ DIVISION), SECP Nemo , Osman Syed2021 CLD 775 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2020-05-08Read full judgment →
• FAIR EDGE SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD Mumtaz A. Chaudhary , Tahir Mahmood Kiani2021 CLD 740 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2020-05-08Read full judgment →
• SHAHEED ZULFIKAR ALI BHUTTO FOUNDATION Versus The DIRECTOR (CLD-CCD), SECP Ejaz Hussain Rathore , Ms. Maheen Fatima2021 CLD 682 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2020-03-24Read full judgment →
• DIN CAPITAL LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Ali Nanji , Osman Syed2020 CLD 1483 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2020-02-07Read full judgment →
• MOHAMMAD MUNIR MOHAMMAD AHMAD KHANANI SECURITIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECP, ISLAMABAD Muhammad Munir Khanani, Abdul Razzaq , Osman Syed2020 CLD 1470 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2020-01-29Read full judgment →
• DIN CAPITAL LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Ali Nanji , Osman Syed2020 CLD 1384 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2020-02-03Read full judgment →
• DIN CAPITAL LIMITED Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION, PUBLIC OFFERING AND REGULATED PERSONS DEPARTMENT, SECP Ali Nanji , Nasir Askar2019 CLD 966 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2019-04-30Read full judgment →
• KHAWAR ALMAS KHAWAJA, CEO Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECP2017 CLD 1580 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2016-11-11Read full judgment →
• ASLAM MALIK AND COMPANY, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS Versus2016 CLD 822 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2014-09-03Read full judgment →
• H. P. BYRAMJI AND CO. (PVT.) LIMITED Versus2016 CLD 426 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2014-08-04Read full judgment →
• AAMIR Versus DIRECTOR/HEAD OF DEPARTMENT (MSRD) Aamir , Mohammad Arslan Zafar2016 CLD 1562 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2015-01-22Read full judgment →
• GHANI OSMAN SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED AND HAJI GHANI OSMAN IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN HUM SECURITIES LIMIED AND DAWOOD EQUITIES LIMITED Versus2015 CLD 768 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2013-10-25Read full judgment →
• The UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Versus2015 CLD 754 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• CREATIVE CAPITAL SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED Versus2015 CLD 738 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2014-01-08Read full judgment →
• ACE SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED Versus2015 CLD 701 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2014-01-22Read full judgment →
• HIGHLINK CAPITAL (PVT.) LIMITED Versus2015 CLD 1172 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2013-11-13Read full judgment →
• TAKAFUL PAKISTAN LIMITED Versus2014 CLD 651 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• TAKAFUL PAKISTAN LIMITED Versus2014 CLD 615 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• ATLAS INSURANCE LIMITED Versus2014 CLD 1715 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• FAIRTRADE CAPITAL SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED Versus2014 CLD 1688 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2014-06-18Read full judgment →
• ZAFAR MOTI CAPITAL SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED Versus2014 CLD 1621 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2013-06-26Read full judgment →
• FIRST NATIONAL EQUITIES LIMITED (FNEL) Versus2014 CLD 1441 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2013-06-06Read full judgment →
• FAIRTRADE CAPITAL SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Versus2014 CLD 1273 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2013-06-28Read full judgment →
• EFU GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED Versus2013 CLD 831 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• EFU GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED Versus2013 CLD 740 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• SHAHEEN INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Versus2013 CLD 2207 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD AAMIR Versus2013 CLD 158 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2012-05-31Read full judgment →
• INDUS FRUIT PRODUCTS LIMITED Versus2011 CLD 645 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2010-12-30Read full judgment →
• EAST WEST INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Versus2011 CLD 627 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• HAMID TEXTILE MILLS LTD Versus2010 CLD 72 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2009-08-17Read full judgment →
• PLATINUM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INSURANCE) Atir Aqeel Ansari , Ms. Nasreen Rashid2010 CLD 1733 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2010-03-18Read full judgment →
• PLATINUM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INSURANCE) Atir Aqeel Ansari , Ms. Nasreen Rashid2010 CLD 1265 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2010-03-18Read full judgment →
• DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus2010 CLD 1110 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2010-05-20Read full judgment →
• PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Versus2009 CLD 1607 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Versus2009 CLD 1602 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2009-04-30Read full judgment →
• PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Versus2009 CLD 1593 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2009-04-30Read full judgment →
• FARAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED Versus Muhammad Ayub, CFO and Company Secretary Jehangir Adam Abdul Aziz2008 CLD 252 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2007-12-17Read full judgment →
• KASHMIR POLYTEX LIMITED: In the matter of Versus KASHMIR POLYTEX LIMITED: In the matter of2007 CLD 1125 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2007-05-22Read full judgment →
• QUALITY STEEL WORKS LIMITED: In the matter of Versus QUALITY STEEL WORKS LIMITED: In the matter of2007 CLD 1116 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2007-05-18Read full judgment →
• In the matter of: Messrs SASTA PHONE (PRIVATE) LTD. Versus In the matter of: Messrs SASTA PHONE (PRIVATE) LTD.2006 CLD 810 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• In the matter of: Messrs AYAZ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED Versus In the matter of: Messrs AYAZ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED2006 CLD 480 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2006-01-06Read full judgment →
• CLIMAX ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (COMPANY LAW), SEC2006 CLD 317 · Securities and Exchange Commission of PakistanRead full judgment →
• In the matter of: Messrs SERVICE FABRICS LIMITED Versus In the matter of: Messrs SERVICE FABRICS LIMITED2006 CLD 1482 · Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan · 2006-08-16Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD IRSHAD & CO. Versus SECRETARY GOVERNMENT KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR2025 CLD 1528 · Peshawar High Court · 2025-04-16Read full judgment →
• Sardar FARAZ HUSSAIN Versus State2025 CLD 1193 · Peshawar High Court · 2025-02-12Read full judgment →
• MALIK LIGHTING Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED2021 CLD 1438 · Peshawar High Court · 2019-09-03Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD AMIR SAFDAR Versus The BANK ALFALAH LIMITED2021 CLD 1418 · Peshawar High Court · 2020-11-25Read full judgment →
• HUSSAIN KHAN Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED2021 CLD 1413 · Peshawar High Court · 2018-09-25Read full judgment →
• AKBAR KHAN Versus SAID GUL2020 CLD 134 · Peshawar High Court · 2019-03-19Read full judgment →
• NIB BANK LIMITED Versus Mian WISAL BACHA2017 CLD 486 · Peshawar High Court · 2016-07-18Read full judgment →
• LIAQAT ALI KHAN Versus Mst. SHAFAQ UROOJ2017 CLD 35 · Peshawar High Court · 2016-08-12Read full judgment →
• ABDUL KAREEM KHAN Versus HAROON-UR-RASHEED TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LTD.2015 CLD 719 · Peshawar High Court · 2014-10-31Read full judgment →
• PHARMATEC PAKISTAN through Managing Director Versus AMJID ALI SHAH2015 CLD 1973 · Peshawar High Court · 2015-06-08
  corporate litigationmaintainability of appealBoard of Directors resolutioncompany representationcivil procedureunauthorized legal proceedings
  Summary & questions settled

  This Regular First Appeal challenged a civil court decree for the recovery of money. The respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal, arguing that the appellant, a private limited company, failed to authorize the filing of the appeal through a valid resolution of its Board of Directors. The appellant contended that a 1997 resolution authorized specific individuals to act on behalf of the company. Upon review, the Court found that the signatories of the vakalatnama were not authorized by any current Board resolution, and the purported 1997 resolution was insufficient and did not refer to a properly convened meeting. The Court held that legal proceedings initiated on behalf of a company are incompetent unless authorized by a resolution passed in a duly convened meeting of the Board of Directors, in accordance with the company's Articles of Association. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, affirming that when the law mandates a specific procedure for an act, it must be strictly followed.

  Questions settled

  • Is an appeal filed on behalf of a company maintainable if the person filing it lacks authorization from a Board of Directors resolution?
  • Does a resolution by circulation without a duly convened meeting satisfy the legal requirement for authorizing legal proceedings on behalf of a company?
  • Can a pleading on behalf of a corporation be signed by a person not authorized by the Board of Directors?
  Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD AKHAN Versus MUHAMMAD SULTAN KHAN2015 CLD 1951 · Peshawar High Court · 2015-06-29Read full judgment →
• SAID RASOOL Versus Dr. HAMAYUN KHAN2014 CLD 284 · Peshawar High Court · 2013-11-04Read full judgment →
• ANWARZEB Versus MUSHTAQ AHMED2014 CLD 1632 · Peshawar High Court · 2014-06-23Read full judgment →
• Syed SHAH PIR MIAN KAZMI Versus Mst. NELOFER (Widow)2012 CLD 850 · Peshawar High CourtRead full judgment →
• NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Versus PUT SARAJEVO GENERAL ENGINEERING COMPANY2012 CLD 464 · Peshawar High Court · 2011-07-05Read full judgment →
• FAZAL ELLAHI Versus AKHTAR ALI2011 CLD 486 · Peshawar High Court · 2010-09-17Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQ Versus ASHIQ BADSHAH or ZAHAWAR SHAH2011 CLD 1586 · Peshawar High Court · 2011-06-09Read full judgment →
• SHAHAB SAQIB Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED2006 CLD 877 · Peshawar High Court · 2005-04-07Read full judgment →
• UNITED FEEDS (PVT.) LTD. Versus PROVINCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)2018 CLD 1454 · Punjab Environmental Tribunal · 2018-03-19Read full judgment →
• HUSSAIN INDUSTRIES CORPORATION PYROLYSIS UNIT, LAHORE Versus ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, PUNJAB2015 CLD 1935 · Punjab Environmental Tribunal · 2015-09-04Read full judgment →
• EFU GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB2025 CLD 996 · Lahore High Court · 2025-03-24
  stamp dutyinsurance companiestrans-provincial businesspublic officestamp auditlegislative competenceConstitution of Pakistan 1973Stamp Act 1899
  Summary & questions settled

  This judgment addresses a batch of constitutional petitions filed by trans-provincial insurance companies challenging audit notices issued by the Chief Inspector of Stamps, Board of Revenue Punjab, aimed at verifying the deposit of stamp duty on insurance policies under the Stamp Act, 1899. The core legal questions involve the legislative competence of the Provincial Assembly to levy stamp duty on trans-provincial insurance businesses governed by federal legislation, and whether insurance companies fall within the definition of "public office" subject to stamp audit under the 1899 Act and the West Pakistan Stamp Inspection and Audit Rules, 1949. The Lahore High Court allowed the petitions, holding that the statutory scheme for stamp audit and impounding applies only to public offices performing public functions under Article 138 of the Constitution, and that the inclusion of private entities and companies within the definition of "public office" is unconstitutional and beyond the scope of provincial legislative competence. The key principle laid down is that public functions and audit powers under the Stamp Act cannot be extended to private commercial entities through statutory fictions in violation of the constitutional distribution of legislative powers.

  Questions settled

  • Whether trans-provincial insurance companies fall within the definition of "public office" under the Stamp Act, 1899 for the purpose of stamp audits?
  • Can the Provincial Assembly confer public functions regarding stamp inspection on private commercial entities under the constitutional framework?
  • Whether the Chief Inspector of Stamps has the lawful authority to direct a stamp audit of insurance companies under Section 73 of the Stamp Act, 1899?
  • What is the scope of audit powers conferred upon stamp auditors under the West Pakistan Stamp Inspection and Audit Rules, 1949?
  Read full judgment →
• TAIGA APPAREL (PVT.) LTD. Versus INTERNATIONAL FABRICATION COMPANY2025 CLD 954 · Lahore High Court · 2025-02-25Read full judgment →
• Malik MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ NAZAM AWAN Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE2025 CLD 913 · Lahore High Court · 2025-03-18Read full judgment →
• IMRAN AHMED MALIK Versus SOHAWA FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED2025 CLD 884 · Lahore High Court · 2025-04-30Read full judgment →
• WAZIR COTTON GINNERS AND OIL MILLS Versus BANK OF PUNJAB2025 CLD 863 · Lahore High Court · 2024-10-10Read full judgment →
• UNITED BANK LIMITED Versus PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN2025 CLD 834 · Lahore High Court · 2025-05-02Read full judgment →
• 5H INSAAT VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI Versus SECRETARY2025 CLD 813 · Lahore High Court · 2025-05-29
  public interest litigationcontractual disputemandatory mediationalternative dispute resolutionRules of Businesswrit jurisdictionprocurement contract
  Summary & questions settled

  This writ petition challenged the validity of termination notices issued by the respondent regarding a contract for a water supply project in Rawalpindi. The petitioner sought the release of mobilization advances and the issuance of work commencement orders. The core legal question concerned the Court's intervention in a contractual dispute involving public interest projects where alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as arbitration and mediation, were available. The Court held that given the public interest nature of the project and the parties' consensus, the termination notices should be set aside. The Court directed the Secretary, Local Government and Community Development Department, to act as a neutral mediator to resolve the disputes between the parties. The judgment established that mediation is a vital, cost-effective, and time-efficient tool for dispute resolution that courts should actively promote. Furthermore, it affirmed that under the Punjab Government Rules of Business, 2011, the Secretary, as the official head of the department, bears the responsibility for efficient administration and can effectively facilitate the amicable resolution of disputes involving government contracts.

  Questions settled

  • Can the High Court direct a government official to act as a mediator in a contractual dispute involving a public interest project?
  • Does the Secretary of a government department have the authority under the Punjab Government Rules of Business, 2011 to facilitate the resolution of disputes?
  • Is mediation considered a preferred method of dispute resolution over traditional litigation in public interest projects?
  Read full judgment →
• MUMTAZ GHANI TEXTILE (PVT.) LTD. Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance2025 CLD 689 · Lahore High Court · 2025-01-21Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD TUFAIL THAKUR Versus ASIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED2025 CLD 1804 · Lahore High Court · 2025-04-21Read full judgment →
• SULTAN MEHMOOD RANA Versus NAEEM AHMAD2025 CLD 1722 · Lahore High Court · 2024-02-19Read full judgment →
• BBJ STEEL LIMITED Versus CARGILL INTERNATIONAL TRADING PTE. LTD.2025 CLD 1702 · Lahore High Court · 2025-06-03Read full judgment →
• KHADIM HUSSAIN SANDHU Versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED2025 CLD 1646 · Lahore High Court · 2025-07-01Read full judgment →
• ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN2025 CLD 1632 · Lahore High Court · 2025-04-29Read full judgment →
• HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED Versus PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT SIALKOT2025 CLD 1517 · Lahore High Court · 2025-05-26Read full judgment →
• EQUITY MASTER SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED Versus PAKISTAN STOCK EXCHANGE LIMITED2025 CLD 1445 · Lahore High Court · 2024-06-03Read full judgment →
• Syed ALI JAVAID HAMDANI Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretary2025 CLD 1398 · Lahore High Court · 2023-06-26Read full judgment →
• FAYSAL BANK LIMITED Versus TAHIR OMER INDUSTRIES LIMITED2025 CLD 1366 · Lahore High Court · 2025-03-26Read full judgment →
• ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES Versus AYAT ENTERPRISES (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED2025 CLD 1349 · Lahore High Court · 2025-05-26Read full judgment →
• SYMPL ENERGY PVT LTD. Versus PRESIDING OFFICER2025 CLD 1317 · Lahore High Court · 2025-05-14Read full judgment →
• ASHFAQ AHMED Versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE/ PRESIDING OFFICER DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, MULTAN2025 CLD 1303 · Lahore High Court · 2025-02-21Read full judgment →
• SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. Versus WASEEM MAJID MALIK2025 CLD 1260 · Lahore High Court · 2025-04-22Read full judgment →
• The BANK OF PUNJAB Versus AGRI INTERNATIONAL2025 CLD 1244 · Lahore High Court · 2025-03-18Read full judgment →
• Mst. KHADIJA BIBI Versus JUDGE BANKING COURT2025 CLD 1226 · Lahore High Court · 2025-05-05Read full judgment →