All Public Universities BPS Teachers Association (APUBTA) through its
This matter before the Supreme Court of Pakistan arises out of proceedings concerning widespread non-compliance with statutory provisions by public sector universities across federal and provincial jurisdictions. The primary legal issue centers on whether public sector universities can lawfully operate with long-vacant executive positions and fail to convene mandatory periodic statutory body meetings. The Supreme Court issued comprehensive directions requiring Vice-Chancellors, Rectors, provincial secretaries, and Higher Education Commission officials to submit written explanations and appear in court regarding persistent statutory breaches. These include leaving key positions—such as Vice-Chancellors, Registrars, Controllers of Examinations, and Treasurers—vacant or under acting charge, and failing to hold prescribed statutory meetings of Senates, Syndicates, and Boards. The Court held that public sector universities funded by the public exchequer must adhere strictly to their governing statutes rather than operate on personal whims. Disregarding statutory requirements concerning tenured appointments and administrative governance adversely impacts academic standards, harms university reputations, and undermines the validity and recognition of awarded degrees.
- Are public sector universities required to strictly fill tenured administrative and executive positions in accordance with their respective governing statutes?
- Does the failure of a public university to hold mandatory statutory meetings of its Senate, Syndicate, or Board constitute a violation of its governing law?
- Can executive heads of public sector universities make temporary or ad-hoc administrative appointments to key tenured positions in contravention of statutory requirements?
ORDER
1.Notices were issued on 15 May 2024 to the respondents who were called upon to submit their comments with regard to the public sector universities within their respective jurisdictions, including identifying the public sector universities in which the position of Vice-Chancellor and other tenured positions are still lying vacant and/or are held on acting charge basis. It was further ordered that the comments should also disclose the statutory requirements regarding the periodic holding of meetings stipulated in their respective laws of such universities and whether they were compliant therewith.
2.This Court through the said order dated 15 May 2024 had also directed as under:
'The posts of Vice-Chancellors, Pro Vice-Chancellors, Rectors, Presidents, Vice-Presidents, Registrars, Heads of Faculties and Departments, Controller of Examination, Director Finance which are mentioned in the applicable laws, wherever lying vacant, should be filled-in as soon as practicable and this be done in accordance with the applicable laws.'
3.The learned Additional Attorney-General ('AAG') submitted report (CMA 5934/2024) on behalf of the Ministry for Federal Education and Professional Training ('the Ministry'). The report mentions that there are only 12 universities under the Ministry's purview, and attends to them as under:
'Engr. Prof. Dr. Akhtar Ali Malik has managed to illegally occupy the post of Vice-Chancellor, NFC Institute of Engineering and Technology, Multan for more than one decade as he has never undergone the proper competitive recruitment process as per laid down rules, using political affiliation and misinterpreting the Institute's rules/statutes to extend his stay illegally.' And, the following tenured positions have been filled-in on acting charge basis: Registrar (since 13 June 2019), Treasurer (since 1 January 2022) and Controller Examination (since 1 September 2020). The Vice-Chancellor of the University shall submit explanation in writing within fourteen days of receipt of this order why the applicable law continues to be violated and shall be in attendance on the next date of hearing.
'The Vice-President shall be appointed by the Board of Governors on the recommendation of the President on such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Board of Governors and exercise such powers as may be delegated to him by the President in consultation with the Rector.' The report states that the University's Board of Trustees neither met in the year 2021 nor in the year 2022, and as such section 18(1) of the Ordinance, which prescribes that the Board of Trustees 'shall meet at least once during a year for regular or scheduled meetings', was apparently contravened. We were informed that the Board of Trustees had met on 11 December 2023 but the minutes of the meeting have not been issued even after 7 months. The report further states that the University's Board of Governors has not met since September 2023 in apparent violation of section 20(1) of the Ordinance, which mandates that it 'shall ordinarily meet once in three months'. The Rector is directed to explain the above noted transgressions of the applicable law and the above- mentioned order of this Court. The Rector shall be in attendance on the next date of hearing. 3. The report submitted on behalf of the Government of Balochistan (CMA 4144/2024) states that Vice-Chancellors of the following 3 universities are working on acting charge basis:
Moreover, the Vice-Chancellors of the following two universities are stated to be working on that position because of stay orders issued by the High Court of Balochistan:
The Secretary, Colleges, Higher and Technical Education Department, Government of Balochistan, shall submit explanation in writing within fourteen days of receipt of this order why the applicable law continues to be violated and shall be in attendance on the next date of hearing and whether the High Court has decided the cases, and its last orders. Details of each university with regard to the abovementioned matters should also be provided.
4.The report submitted on behalf of the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (CMA 4136/2024) states that out of 34 universities, 19 universities are working without a regular Vice-Chancellor. The learned Advocate-General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa submits that the process for appointment of the Vice-Chancellors was almost complete and that a summary mentioning three names against each vacant post has been sent for the approval of the provincial cabinet, but copy thereof has not been submitted to this Court nor the criteria for selection. The information about other tenured posts and whether or not meetings are regularly held has also not been provided. The Secretary, Higher Education, Archives and Libraries Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, shall submit the requisite information and explain in writing within fourteen days of receipt of this order why the applicable law continues to be violated and shall be in attendance on the next date of hearing. Details of each university with regard to the abovementioned matters should also be provided.
5.The report submitted on behalf of the Government of Punjab (CMA 4138/2024) states that out of 34 universities, 25 are working without a regular Vice-Chancellor. The learned Additional Advocate- General Punjab submits that the Lahore High Court had prohibited the caretaker government from appointments to these positions, however, subsequently a search committee was formed and the process of making appointments is expected to be completed within 2 months. The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Punjab, shall submit compliance report if compliance is made, failing which explain in writing within fourteen days of receipt of this order why the applicable law continues to be violated and shall be in attendance on the next date of hearing. Details of each university with regard to the abovementioned matters should also be provided.
6.The report submitted on behalf of the Government of Sindh (CMA 4084/2024) states that 7 universities are working without a regular Vice-Chancellor. The report also states that several universities do not hold the prescribed meetings of the statutory bodies:
The report states that many tenured positions in these universities have been filled-in on temporary basis which does not appear to conform to the law. The Vice-Chancellors of these universities and the Secretary, Higher Education Commission, Government of Sindh, are directed to submit explanation in writing within fourteen days of receipt of this order why the applicable law continues to be violated and shall be in attendance on the next date of hearing. Details of each university with regard to the abovementioned matters should also be provided.
7.We are informed that the HEC has prescribed an ideal ratio of academic to non-academic staff to be 1:1.5, which nearly all universities are failing to abide by in that the non-academic staff far exceeds the said ratio. This appears to be one of the reasons for the financial problems being faced by the universities. The Federation, Provinces and the Islamabad Capital Territory to submit whether directions have been issued to ensure that the universities shall restrict/stop further employment of non-academic staff.
8.The public sector universities must comply with their respective laws, and if those in charge of them are disregarding the same for no justifiable reason, then they must demonstrate that they are still competent to hold their respective positions. The laws governing these universities require that the meetings of syndicates, senates, boards of governors and boards of trustees, as applicable, must be periodically held. Universities must not leave vacant important positions of vice-chancellors, presidents, vice-presidents, registrars, heads of faculties and departments, controller of examination and director finance as in doing so they contravene the applicable laws. This state of affairs whereby the law is disregarded cannot be allowed to continue.
9.Considerable amount from the public exchequer is spent on public sector universities. These universities must abide by their respective laws. Unfortunately, we note that many are being run in contravention of their laws on the personal whim of those placed in charge thereof. These transgressions adversely affect academics, the reputation and standing of Pakistani universities and also undermine the degrees awarded by them.
10.Copies of this order be sent to the respective Vice-Chancellors/Rectors and all to those not compliant (as noted above) who are directed to submit within two weeks of the receipt of the notice their response under their own signatures explaining why they are not complying with the law governing their university and why appropriate actions may not be recommended to be initiated, or be initiated, as the case may be, against them. They shall also be in attendance on the next date of hearing.
11.Relist after the expiry of the said notice period.
Judges on this bench
- Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi982 judgments
- Naeem Akhtar Afghan380 judgments
- Qazi Faez Isa (C.J)94 judgments