Public at Large Versus Capital Development Authority and another
This matter originated from a note by the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Pakistan regarding public complaints of systematic deforestation and the cutting of trees in Fatima Jinnah Park, F-9, Islamabad, allegedly directed by the Capital Development Authority (CDA). The Committee constituted under the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 directed that the matter be registered as a constitution petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973. The Supreme Court held that the matter satisfies the preconditions of Article 184(3) as it involves public interest and impacts fundamental rights, specifically the right to access public places under Article 26 and the right to life under Article 9, which is degraded by environmental damage. Consequently, the Court issued notices to the respondents, directed the CDA to submit a detailed report on the deforestation activities, appointed joint commissioners to inspect and document the site, and issued an interim injunction restraining the CDA from cutting any further trees or proceeding with deforestation until the next hearing.
- Does systematic deforestation in a public park impact the fundamental right to life under Article 9 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973?
- Whether the cutting of trees in a public park by a municipal authority requires prior approval from the Environmental Protection Agency?
- Can the Supreme Court appoint joint commissioners under Order XXXII of the Supreme Court Rules 1980 to inspect and document environmental degradation in a pending public interest litigation?
- Article 184(3), Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Article 9, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Article 26, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Section 2, Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023
- Section 2(a), Islamabad (Preservation of Landscape) Ordinance, 1966
- Section 4, Islamabad (Preservation of Landscape) Ordinance, 1966
- Order XXXII, Supreme Court Rules, 1980
ORDER
The Registrar of the Supreme Court had put up a note before the Committee constituted under section 2 of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 to consider whether proceedings may be commenced under Article 184(3) of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (respectively the 'Committee' and 'Constitution'). The note stated that 'It has been reported that a larger number of trees have been cut and there is a systematic deforestation taking place at the Fatima Jinnah Park, F-9, Islamabad. Citizens are complaining that the trees which have been cut and the ongoing deforestation is on the directions of the Capital Development Authority and that the Supreme Court should intervene to prevent this valuable resource of the citizens from being destroyed.'
2.The Committee directed that this matter be numbered as a constitution petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution and the Capital Development Authority ('CDA') and the Government of Pakistan be arrayed as respondents and the Public at large be designated as the petitioner.
3.Given the public importance of this matter and its impact on the fundamental rights of citizens of Pakistan, including rights in respect of access to public places under Article 26, which may have been undermined and as it involves deforestation and the cutting of trees which degrades the right to life under Article 9 of the Constitution as interpreted by this Court, the two preconditions stipulated in Article 184(3) of the Constitution are met. We have been informed that this Court had earlier also taken notice under Article 184(3) of the Constitution with regard to illegal activities in the Fatima Jinnah Park Islamabad ('the Park') in a case (Human Rights Cases No.4668 of 2006, 1111 of 2007 and 15283-G of 2010, PLD 2010 SC 759). Let notice be issued to CDA and the Government of Pakistan through the Ministry of Climate Change and Environmental Coordination. Notice be also issued to the Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency ('EPA') and to the Islamabad Wildlife Management Board.
4.Learned Additional-Attorney General for Pakistan ('AAG') is in attendance and waives notice on behalf of Government of Pakistan. He has drawn our attention to the Islamabad (Preservation of Landscape) Ordinance, 1966 ('Ordinance') and referred to the definition of 'landscape' in its section 2(a) and that such landscape has to be preserved as stipulated in section 4 of the Ordinance. Learned AAG informs us that the Park comprises of the entire F-9 Sector of Islamabad, and the Park is under the control and management of CDA. Therefore, let CDA submit a report with regard to the following matters:
5.Mr. Imran Waseem, the General Secretary of the Press Association of Supreme Court ('PASC'), is present and he together with Mian Aqeel Afzal, the President of PASC, are appointed as joint commissioners under Order XXXII of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 to visit the Park and take photographs/record videos showing the area where trees have been cut and area deforested. CDA and the security guards at the Park are directed to co-operate with the commissioners. The commissioners to submit their report with photographs and recordings on the next date of hearing. The fee of the commissioners will be determined later.
6.We appoint Messrs Saad Mumtaz Hashmi and Syed Hassan Ali Raza, subject to them agreeing, to represent the Public. To better assist the Court they may personally visit the Park with the commissioners or by themselves.
7.Till the next date of hearing, CDA shall not cut any tree or proceed with further deforestation. Learned AAG shall inform the CDA immediately about this order dictated in Court today.
8.To come up on 4 March 2024.
Judges on this bench
- Muhammad Ali Mazhar1,594 judgments
- Qazi Faez Isa (C.J)94 judgments