Pakistan Case Law
← Search
1995 SCMR 1061
[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Mst. ZAINAB BIBI and 8 others Versus ABDUL MALIK and 12 others

Civil Petition No, 224 of 1994, decided on 29th November, 1994.
Authored by Saiduzzaman Siddiqui. Result: Leave granted.
⭐ Prefer in Google
Summary

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan, arising from a Civil Revision Application filed by the petitioners in September 1990. The core legal question presented for determination is whether the High Court erred in dismissing the petitioners' Civil Revision Application on the ground that it was filed beyond the 90-day limitation period prescribed by the second proviso to subsection (1) of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. The central issue is whether this limitation period, introduced by Act No. VI of 1992, which was promulgated on 30-5-1992, could be applied retrospectively to a revision application that had already been filed in September 1990, well before the enactment of the amending legislation. The Court granted leave to appeal to examine the validity of the High Court's application of this statutory amendment to pending proceedings, thereby addressing the principle of non-retroactivity of procedural amendments affecting vested rights of litigation, specifically regarding the temporal application of statutory limitation periods introduced after the initiation of legal proceedings.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a statutory amendment introducing a limitation period be applied retrospectively to a civil revision application filed prior to the enactment of said amendment?
  • Does the second proviso to subsection (1) of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, as introduced by Act No. VI of 1992, apply to revision applications pending at the time of its promulgation?
Laws & provisions referred
civil revisionlimitation periodretrospective applicationprocedural lawleave to appealvested rights

ORDER

SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.---Leave is granted in the case to consider whether the Civil Revision Application filed by the petitioners under section 115, C.P.C. In September 1990, could be dismissed by the High Court on the ground that it was filed beyond the period of 90 days prescribed under the 2nd proviso to subsection (1) of section 115, C.P.C. Which was added in the Code of Civil Procedure by Act No, VI of 1992 promulgated on 30-5-1992.

Judges on this bench

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.