MUHAMMAD ANWAR and anothers Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL and others
This petition for leave to appeal arises from a suit for pre-emption filed by the petitioners, which was dismissed by the trial court on 12-12-1984. Subsequent appeals filed by the petitioners before the District Judge and the High Court were also dismissed. The High Court's dismissal was predicated on the finding that no decree had been passed in favour of the appellants before the target date, and consequently, no such decree could be granted in light of established Supreme Court of Pakistan precedents. Before the Supreme Court, the petitioners contended that the dismissal of their suit constituted a decree, thereby entitling them to relief. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, affirming that the legal position regarding pre-emption suits where no decree was passed before the relevant target date is well-settled. Relying on the principle established in Rozi Khan v. Karim Shah (1992 SCMR 445), the Court held that the petitioners could not be granted relief. The petition was accordingly dismissed, and leave to appeal was refused.
- Does the dismissal of a pre-emption suit constitute a decree for the purposes of relief?
- Can a decree be passed in a pre-emption suit after the target date has passed?
- Is a suit for pre-emption maintainable if no decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff before the target date?
ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J.---The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court dated 20-12-1992.
2.The petitioners filed a suit for pre-emption which was dismissed on 12-12-1984. The appeal filed by them was also dismissed by the District Judge on 14-6-1989. The second appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed for the following reasons:--
"Admittedly, no decree has been passed in favour of the appellants before the target date and none can be passed now keeping in view the law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. In this view of the matter, there is no force in this R.S.A. Dismissed."
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the dismissal of the suit also amounts to decree, therefore, the petitioners cannot be non-suited. This contention has no weight. The legal position is now well settled in view of the judgment this Court in Rozi Khan v. Karim Shah (1992 SCM R 445).
This petition has no force. The same is dismissed and the leave prayed for refused.
Judges on this bench
- Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry1,248 judgments
- Saleem Akhtar1,928 judgments