Pakistan Case Law
← Search
1995 SCMR 153
[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

SAFDAR ALI MALIK Versus THE ESTATE OFFICER, ESTATE OFFICE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and 4 others

Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No, 17 of 1994, decided on 26th January, 1994.
Authored by Muhammad Rafiq Tarar. Result: Leave granted.
⭐ Prefer in Google
Summary

This petition for leave to appeal arises from a judgment of the Lahore High Court, which dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the cancellation of his government accommodation allotment. The petitioner, a civil servant, had his allotment of a government quarter cancelled and re-allotted to another party. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds that the matter concerned the terms and conditions of service of a civil servant, thereby falling within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal. Before the Supreme Court, the petitioner challenged this finding, relying on precedent to argue that the allotment of government housing does not constitute a term or condition of service. The Supreme Court found that the contention raised by the petitioner regarding the nature of government accommodation allotments in relation to service matters required further examination. Consequently, the Court granted leave to appeal to determine whether such disputes are excluded from the jurisdiction of Service Tribunals and remain amenable to writ jurisdiction under the Constitution.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the allotment of government accommodation to a civil servant constitute a term and condition of service?
  • Is a dispute regarding the cancellation of government housing allotment within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal?
  • Can a civil servant challenge the cancellation of government accommodation through a writ petition under Article 199 of the Constitution?
civil servantallotment of government accommodationterms and conditions of serviceService Tribunal jurisdictionwrit jurisdictionleave to appeal

ORDER

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.---Safdar Ali petitioner seeks leave to appeal from the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court dated 29-11-1993 whereby his Writ Petition No, 475/1990 was dismissed.

2.The brief facts are that the petitioner who is a civil servant filed a write petition in the Lahore High Court challenging the order dated 5-9-1989 whereby the allotment of Quarter No, 259-E, G-6/2, was cancelled from his name and was later on allowed to be retained by Mst. Nasim Akhtar widow of Dr. Khurshid Ahmed. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground that admittedly be "is a civil servant and is aggrieved of alleged violation of terms and conditions of service, therefore, his remedy is before the relevant Service Tribunal....".

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on Aminur Rehman's case (1989 SCM R 1948) to contend that allotment of quarters/houses is not included in the terms and conditions of service of civil servants. The contention requires examination. Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted.

Judges on this bench

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.