UMAR DRAZ Versus THE STATE
This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan, challenging the findings of the lower courts in a criminal case. The core legal question presented for consideration is whether the lower courts correctly applied the established principles governing the appraisal of evidence in criminal proceedings, as previously laid down by the Supreme Court. The Court granted leave to appeal to examine the correctness of the lower courts' evidentiary assessment. The judgment serves as a procedural step in the appellate process, focusing on the necessity of ensuring that criminal convictions are based on a proper and legally sound evaluation of the evidence on record, in accordance with the standards set by the apex court.
- Did the lower courts correctly follow the principles governing the appraisal of evidence in criminal cases?
- Is the appraisal of evidence by lower courts subject to review by the Supreme Court upon the grant of leave to appeal?
ORDER
MUHAMMAD RARIQ TARAR, J.---Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether the Courts below have correctly followed the principles governing arraisement of evidence in criminal cases as laid down by this Court.
Judges on this bench
- Muhammad Rafiq Tarar605 judgments
- Wali Muhammad Khan585 judgments
- Manzoor Hussain Sial807 judgments