Latest Judgments

Newly reported judgments from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the High Courts and tribunals, added as they are processed — free, full text, updated daily. Judgments marked NEW were added in the most recent update. 79,348 judgments in total from the Lahore High Court.

• Khaliq Dad vs The State1993 MLD 2048 · Lahore High Court · 1993-03-06Read full judgment →
• Khalil-ur-Rehman Khan, Sardar Muhammad Dogar, Irshad Hasan Khan, Sh.1993 MLD 2152 · Lahore High Court · 1993-07-21Read full judgment →
• Khalid Pervez vs Mohammad Hanif KianiK.L.R. 1993 Civil Cases 58 · Lahore High Court · 1991-06-16Read full judgment →
• Khalid Mirza vs Rana Zahid Mahmood, Additional District Judge, Lahore and 2 others1993 PLD Lahore 912 · Lahore High Court · 1993-09-25Read full judgment →
• Khalid Mahmood vs The University of the Punjab, Lahore1993 MLD 2360 · Lahore High Court · 1993-03-01Read full judgment →
• Khalid Mahmood alias Khalid Moosa vs The State1993 MLD 1748 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-12Read full judgment →
• Khadim Hussain vs The State1993 MLD 384 · Lahore High Court · 1992-05-12Read full judgment →
• Khadim Hussain vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 2097 · Lahore High Court · 1993-04-04Read full judgment →
• Karim Bakhsh vs Additional District Judge, Khanewal and 5 others1993 MLD 2164 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-05Read full judgment →
• Karamat Masih Alias Jagga And 2 Other vs The StateK.L.R.1993 Criminal Cases 355 · Lahore High Court · 1993-03-07Read full judgment →
• Karamat Ali vs Haji Muhammad Hussain and 4 others1993 P Cr. L J 2112 · Lahore High Court · 1993-07-14Read full judgment →
• Karam Hussain Shah and 3 others vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1228 · Lahore High Court · 1993-02-22Read full judgment →
• Karam Dad and anothers vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 251 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-28Read full judgment →
• Karam Ali through Legal Heirs and 3 others vs Muhammad Nawaz Minor1993 PLD Lahore 49 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-30Read full judgment →
• Karam (deceased) through Legal Heirs/Plaintiffs vs Ramzan and others1993 MLD 2118 · Lahore High Court · 1993-07-06Read full judgment →
• Junejo Flour Mills vs Commissioner of Income-Tax, Lahore and others1993 PTD 27 · Lahore High Court · 1992-02-17Read full judgment →
• Jind Wadda alias Bhattal vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 565 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-21Read full judgment →
• Jeenda vs Palia1993 CLC 572 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-24Read full judgment →
• Jayed Iqbal Bokhari vs Deputy Registrar, Co-Operatives Deptt. LahoreK.L.R. 1993 Labour & Service Cases 90 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-11Read full judgment →
• Javeed Zia vs Returning Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Ahmadpur1993 MLD 40 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-14Read full judgment →
• Javed Zafar Khan and others vs Additional Settlement Commissioner1993 CLC 1119 · Lahore High Court · 1992-07-29Read full judgment →
• Javed Iqbal vs Zila Council, Sialkot and others1993 CLC 900 · Lahore High Court · 1992-07-15Read full judgment →
• Javed Iqbal vs The State1993 MLD 1713 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-08Read full judgment →
• Javaid Iqbal vs The State1993 P Cr. L. J 303 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-26Read full judgment →
• Javaid Hussain Sheikh vs Mst. Fehmida Qaisar and others1993 CLC 649 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-14Read full judgment →
• Javaid Hassan Sheikh vs (Mst.) Fehmida Qaisar Etc.K.L.R. 1993 Ciyil Cases 46 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-14Read full judgment →
• Jan Muhammad vs Muhammad Ismail and others1993 P Cr. L J 907 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-04Read full judgment →
• Jan Muhammad alias Jani and anothers vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1504 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-14Read full judgment →
• Jan Muhammad Alias Jani And Another vs The StateK.L.R. 1933 Criminal Cases 236 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-14Read full judgment →
• Jamshed Ali vs The StateK.L.R. 1993 Shariat Cases 48 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-11Read full judgment →
• Jamshed Ali . vs The State1993 MLD 2242 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-11Read full judgment →
• Jamil Ahmad Khan vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 750 · Lahore High Court · 1992-08-17Read full judgment →
• Jamat Ali And Other vs BahadurK.L.R. 1993 Civil Cases 168 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-23Read full judgment →
• Jamat Ali and 7 others vs Bahadur1993 PLD Lahore 9 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-23Read full judgment →
• Jamal Din vs Hassan Din and another1993 MLD 796 · Lahore High Court · 1993-01-25Read full judgment →
• Jamal Din and 2 others vs Nawab Muhammad Khan1993 MLD 787 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-14Read full judgment →
• Jam Pallo vs Bashir Ahmad and another1993 PLD Lahore 168 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-06
  pre-emptionsecond appealwaiverestoppelexchange of landrevenue record
  Summary & questions settled

  This regular second appeal arose from a pre-emption suit filed by respondent No. 1 against the appellant (vendee) regarding agricultural land sold by respondent No. 2 (the pre-emptor's father). The appellant contended that the transaction was an exchange rather than a sale, and that the pre-emptor was estopped from suing because the suit was allegedly filed for the benefit of the vendor, who had assisted in obtaining revenue records. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding it was for the vendor's benefit, but the first appellate court reversed this decision. The High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that since the appellant failed to challenge the trial court's finding on the 'exchange' issue before the first appellate court, he was precluded from raising it in a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. Furthermore, the Court ruled that waiver must be proved by cogent, unequivocal evidence, and merely obtaining certified copies of revenue records does not establish that a suit was filed for the vendor's benefit.

  Questions settled

  • Can a party raise a new factual issue in a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 if they failed to urge it before the first appellate court?
  • What standard of proof is required to establish the waiver of a right of pre-emption?
  • Does the mere act of a vendor obtaining certified copies of revenue records for a pre-emptor establish that the pre-emption suit was filed for the vendor's benefit?
  Read full judgment →
• Jalal Din vs Muhammad Sharif and another1993 P Cr. L J 2178 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-12Read full judgment →
• Jaffer vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 363 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-18Read full judgment →
• Jaffar alias Sawalla and others vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 869 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-18Read full judgment →
• Jaffar Ali Shah vs The State1993 MLD 2221 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-02Read full judgment →
• Jaffar 1Bqal and others vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1749 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-01Read full judgment →
• Jafar Khan and another vs Vice-Chancellor, Islamia University, Bahawalpur and 28 others1993 MLD 1083 · Lahore High Court · 1993-01-18
  writ petitionwithdrawal of petitionlachesnon-statutory rulessuppression of factsacademic admissionres judicata
  Summary & questions settled

  This constitutional petition challenged the decision of the Islamia University, Bahawalpur, to strike off the petitioners' names from the rolls due to short attendance, alleging discriminatory treatment compared to other students who were readmitted. The core legal questions were whether a second writ petition is maintainable after the unconditional withdrawal of a previous one on the same facts without seeking permission to file afresh, whether non-statutory university regulations are enforceable via writ jurisdiction, and whether the petition was barred by laches and the suppression of material facts. The Court held that the petition was barred under Order XXIII, Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as the petitioners withdrew their previous petition without reserving the right to file a new one. Furthermore, the Court found the petitioners guilty of suppressing material facts and laches, noting that the academic session had concluded. The Court also affirmed that non-statutory university admission regulations are generally not enforceable through constitutional petitions unless they violate natural justice. The petition was dismissed.

  Questions settled

  • Is a second writ petition maintainable if the first one was withdrawn unconditionally without permission to file a fresh one?
  • Can non-statutory university admission regulations be enforced through a constitutional petition?
  • Does the suppression of the fact of a previously withdrawn petition disentitle a petitioner to equitable relief in writ jurisdiction?
  • Can a delay of one year in filing a constitutional petition constitute laches sufficient to dismiss the petition?
  Read full judgment →
• Islamic Republic of Pakistan, through General Manager, Pakistan1993 PLD Lahore 277 · Lahore High CourtRead full judgment →
• Islamia University, Bahawalpur through Vice Chancellor vs Dr.1993 PLD Lahore 141 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-11
  Intra-Court Appealjudicial reviewemergent powersVice-ChancellorSyndicatedisciplinary proceedingsinter-departmental transfertransitory provisionsdelegation of powerslimitation during summer vacation
  Summary & questions settled

  This consolidated judgment by the Lahore High Court decided three Intra-Court Appeals and two writ petitions concerning administrative actions taken by the Vice-Chancellor of Islamia University, Bahawalpur against Associate Professors. The Vice-Chancellor had transferred the professors to non-academic posts, suspended them, appointed an authorised officer, and initiated disciplinary proceedings under the Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Employees Efficiency and Discipline Statute, 1976, claiming authority under Sections 15(3) and 15(4) of the Islamia University of Bahawalpur Act, 1975, alongside delegated powers from a former Chancellor Committee under Section 50. The core legal questions involved the scope of the Vice-Chancellor's emergent powers, whether 'assignment' under Section 15(4)(vi) includes inter-departmental transfers, the survival of transitional delegations, and the susceptibility of such executive actions to judicial review. The High Court held that all discretionary and emergent powers are subject to judicial review under Article 199 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that Section 15(4)(vi) does not authorise transferring specialist faculty across disciplines, that appointing authorised officers and initiating formal disciplinary actions fall exclusively within the Syndicate's jurisdiction under Section 25, and that the 1981 delegation expired upon the Syndicate's constitution. Consequently, the appeals by the University were dismissed, while the petitions filed by the professors were accepted.

  Questions settled

  • Are the emergent and administrative powers exercised by a University Vice-Chancellor under the Islamia University of Bahawalpur Act 1975 subject to judicial review under Article 199 of the Constitution?
  • Does the power to direct employees to take up assignments under Section 15(4)(vi) of the Islamia University of Bahawalpur Act 1975 include the authority to transfer specialist academic faculty from one department to another?
  • Can a Vice-Chancellor initiate full formal disciplinary proceedings and appoint an authorised officer under Section 15(3) of the Act without prior authority from the Syndicate?
  • Does a delegation of statutory authority granted by a transitional Chancellor Committee under Section 50 of the Act survive after the permanent Senate and Syndicate are duly constituted?
  • Is an Intra-Court Appeal filed after the normal limitation period saved by Section 4 of the Limitation Act if filed immediately following the High Court's summer vacation?
  Read full judgment →
• Islamia University Bahawalpur through ViceChancellor and 2 others vs Prof. Dr. Muhammad Bilal and 4 others1993 CLC 2066 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-04Read full judgment →
• Isac Bashir vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 44 · Lahore High Court · 1992-05-02Read full judgment →
• Irshad Ullah vs Board of Technical Education, Government of Punjab, Lahore and another1993 CLC 826 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-26Read full judgment →
• Irfan Ahmad alias Papa Dar vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1751 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-07Read full judgment →
• Inayatullah & Co through Managing Partner and another vs Secretary, Local Government and Rural Development Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore and 4 others1993 MLD 2066 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-05Read full judgment →
• Inayat Ullah & Co. And Another vs Secy. Local Govt, And 4 OtherK.L.R. 1993 Tax & Custom Cases 69 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-05Read full judgment →
• Inayat Bibi vs Zafar and another1993 MLD 513 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-27Read full judgment →
• Inayat Ali alias Inayat Hussain and others vs Muhammad alias Tota and others1993 MLD 2367 · Lahore High Court · 1993-04-07Read full judgment →
• Inamul Haque vs Mst. Sharifan Bibi and 2 others1993 CLC 46 · Lahore High Court · 1992-05-12
  constitutional jurisdictiondissolution of marriageKhulaex parte decreematrimonial disputediscretionary jurisdictionservice of summons
  Summary & questions settled

  This constitutional petition challenges an ex parte decree for the dissolution of marriage granted in favour of the respondent on the basis of Khula. The petitioner alleged that the trial court proceedings were without jurisdiction due to lack of proper service and that he was unaware of subsequent court orders requiring his personal appearance. The High Court declined to exercise its discretionary constitutional jurisdiction, noting that the petitioner's contentions regarding service and lack of knowledge involved disputed questions of fact requiring evidence, which are impermissible in constitutional proceedings. Furthermore, the Court observed that the trial court had provided multiple opportunities for the petitioner to explain his non-appearance, which he failed to utilize. The Court held that when marital relations are so strained that spouses cannot live within the limits prescribed by God Almighty, it is appropriate to annul the union to prevent further agony. Given that the respondent had already contracted a second marriage and expressed a firm refusal to live with the petitioner, the petition was dismissed as meritless.

  Questions settled

  • Can a High Court resolve disputed questions of fact in constitutional jurisdiction?
  • Is a constitutional petition an appropriate remedy to challenge an ex parte decree where the petitioner failed to appear despite opportunities to explain his absence?
  • Does the fact that a wife has contracted a second marriage after a dissolution decree influence the court's decision to maintain that decree?
  Read full judgment →
• In Re: Mehr Shahadat Khan vs Not1993 CLC 1357 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-07Read full judgment →
• Imtiaz Rafi Butt _ vs The Income Tax Officer1993P T D 265 · Lahore High Court · 1993-01-10Read full judgment →
• Imtiaz Ali and anothers vs The State1.993 P Cr. L J 1262 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-03Read full judgment →
• Imdad Khan vs Settlement Commissioner1993 MLD 1665 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-05Read full judgment →
• Imam Din vs The Province of Punjab and others1993 CLC 2055 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-16Read full judgment →
• Ikramullah alias Zafar vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 2273 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-26Read full judgment →
• Ijaz and others vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 2492 · Lahore High Court · 1993-04-19Read full judgment →
• Ijaz Ahmad vs The StateK.L.R. 1993 Criminal Cases 1 · Lahore High Court · 1992-01-21Read full judgment →
• Iftikhar alias Kala and anothers vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1760 · Lahore High Court · 1993-03-15Read full judgment →
• Iftikhar Ahmad and 7 others vs Habib Bank Limited, Karachi and anothers1993 CLC 101 · Lahore High Court · 1992-07-07
  clerical erroramendment of decreemerger of decreesfuture interestBanking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinancelimitationappellate jurisdiction
  Summary & questions settled

  This matter concerns an application filed under sections 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the correction of an appellate decree passed by the High Court. The core legal question was whether the High Court could amend a decree to rectify an accidental clerical error regarding the grant of future interest, and whether such an application was maintainable before the appellate court rather than the trial court. The Court held that the error in the decree was clerical and accidental, as the original judgment intended to grant interest as mandated by section 8(2) of the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979. The Court affirmed that the original decree merges into the appellate decree upon the dismissal of an appeal, making the application maintainable before the High Court. Furthermore, the Court established the principle that an act or omission of the Court should not prejudice any party, and clerical errors in decrees can be corrected at any time, as the doctrine of limitation does not apply to such judicial corrections.

  Questions settled

  • Does an original decree merge into an appellate decree upon the dismissal of an appeal?
  • Can a court correct a clerical error in a decree under sections 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908?
  • Does the law of limitation apply to the correction of clerical errors committed by a court?
  • Is an application for the correction of a decree maintainable before the appellate court after the appeal has been decided?
  Read full judgment →
• Iftikhar Ahmad And 7 Other vs Habib Bank Limited, Habib Bank Plaza, Karachi And AnotherK.L.R. 1993 Civil Cases 155 · Lahore High CourtRead full judgment →
• Idrees Anwar vs National Industrial Cooperative Finance1993 CLC 1207 · Lahore High Court · 1991-05-29Read full judgment →
• I.C.I. Pakistan Ltd., Soda Ash Works, Khewra, District Jhelum vs Zila1993 MLD 32 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-04
  writ jurisdictionalternate remedyexhaustion of remediestax levyZila Councilexcavation taxconstitutional petition
  Summary & questions settled

  This constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 challenged the levy and collection of excavation tax on limestone by the Zila Council, Chakwal, under the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979. The petitioner contended that the tax was unauthorized, unsupported by a proper official gazette notification, and levied despite the payment of export tax, arguing that the act was totally void and that available statutory remedies were inadequate. The core legal question was whether the High Court should exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction when an adequate alternate remedy by way of appeal and statutory revision was available under the local government laws. The Lahore High Court held that the presence of an alternate remedy is an important regulatory factor, and though not an absolute bar, the rule of exhaustion of statutory remedies must be insisted upon in tax matters unless exceptional circumstances exist. The Court concluded that the remedies provided under sections 156 and 157 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, and the Punjab Local Councils (Appeal) Rules, 1980, were efficacious and dismissed the petition, directing the petitioner to first pursue its statutory remedies.

  Questions settled

  • Whether the presence of an alternate statutory remedy bars the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973?
  • Are remedies provided under sections 156 and 157 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, adequate and efficacious for challenging the illegal levy of a tax by a Zila Council?
  • Does the delegation of powers under the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, exhaust the supervisory source power of the Government?
  Read full judgment →
• Hussain Sugar Mills Ltd., Faisalabad vs The Government of the Punjab1993 MLD 1625 · Lahore High Court · 1993-05-04Read full judgment →
• Hoshiar Ali vs Ghulam Sabir1993 CLC 2476 · Lahore High Court · 1992-06-06
  res judicataconsolidated suitscivil revisionmaintainability of appealrival suitsproperty ownership
  Summary & questions settled

  This civil revision petition arises from a dispute over the ownership of a shop, involving two consolidated suits: one filed by the petitioner claiming title through a registered sale-deed, and a rival suit filed by the respondent challenging the validity of a prior decree that transferred the property. The trial court consolidated the suits, dismissing the petitioner's suit and decreeing the respondent's suit. The petitioner filed an appeal only against the decree in his own suit, failing to challenge the decree in the rival suit. The core legal question was whether the failure to file a separate appeal against the connected decree in the rival suit renders the appeal against the other decree unsustainable due to the principle of res judicata. The High Court held that the failure to challenge the connected decree, which had become final, operated as res judicata, thereby barring the revision. The court affirmed that a decision in a rival suit, when not appealed, precludes the reopening of the issues decided therein, even if the objection was not raised before the lower appellate court.

  Questions settled

  • Does the failure to file a separate appeal against a decree passed in a consolidated rival suit render an appeal against the other decree unsustainable due to res judicata?
  • Can the objection of res judicata based on the failure to appeal a connected decree be raised for the first time in a revision petition before the High Court?
  • Does a decree in a rival suit operate as res judicata against a party who fails to challenge it through a separate appeal?
  Read full judgment →
• Hidayatullah vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1722 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-03Read full judgment →
• Hidayat Masih vs The StateK.L.R. 1993 Criminal Cases 250 · Lahore High Court · 1993-01-25Read full judgment →
• Hidayat Masih vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 1518 · Lahore High Court · 1990-09-25Read full judgment →
• Hedayatullah and others vs Ghulam Sarwar and others1993 CLC 1524 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-22Read full judgment →
• Hayat vs Mst. Bibi and others1993 MLD 1002 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-17Read full judgment →
• Havaldar Army M. Younas vs Chairman, Border Area Committee1993 CLC 1134 · Lahore High Court · 1992-07-27Read full judgment →
• Hashmat Ali through Legal Heirs vs Settlement1993 CLC 21 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-13Read full judgment →
• Hashmat Ali (Deceased) Through L.Rs. vs S.C._Administrator (R.P), Lahore Division, Lahore And AnotherK.L.R. 1993 Civil Cases 208 · Lahore High CourtRead full judgment →
• Haq Nawaz vs The StateK.L.R. 1993 Shariat Cases 45 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-04Read full judgment →
• Haq Nawaz and 2 others vs S.H.O., Police Station Lalian, District Jhang1993 P Cr. L J 1004 · Lahore High Court · 1993-02-28Read full judgment →
• Hanif Arif vs Secretary Health Government of the Punjab And 4 OtherK.L.R. 1993 Labour & Service Cases 167 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-15Read full judgment →
• Hamand vs Member Board of Revenue (Consolidation) and others1993 MLD 267 · Lahore High Court · 1989-04-12Read full judgment →
• Hakim Textile Mills vs Pakistan1993 MLD 182 · Lahore High Court · 1989-10-07Read full judgment →
• Haji Muhammad Siddique and others vs The Chief Administrator of Auqaf, Punjab, Lahore1993 MLD 1612 · Lahore High Court · 1992-11-18
  waqf propertylimitationauqaf departmentshrine managementdedication by userwrong forum
  Summary & questions settled

  This civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Additional District Judge, Lahore, which dismissed a petition filed under section 11 of the Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance, 1979, challenging the notification issued by the Chief Administrator of Auqaf taking over the control and management of the Mazar of Baba Rehmat Shah. The core legal questions involve whether the petition was barred by limitation and whether the disputed property constituted waqf property by user. The Lahore High Court held that the petition was time-barred, as agitating a matter in a wrong forum or under mistaken legal advice does not extend limitation, and that the appellant had sufficient constructive notice of the takeover. Furthermore, the Court held on merits that a waqf can be created not only by specific dedication but also through long-standing religious or charitable user, and that the surrounding land appurtenant to the shrine properly fell within the ambit of waqf property. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as meritless.

  Questions settled

  • Does agitating a matter in the wrong forum or under wrong legal advice constitute sufficient ground for condonation of delay under the law of limitation?
  • Can a waqf be created through long-standing public user for religious or charitable purposes in the absence of a specific dedication?
  • Whether a petition filed under section 11 of the Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance, 1979, beyond the prescribed period of thirty days is maintainable?
  • Does the area of influence and land appurtenant to a shrine extend beyond the physical structure of the tomb and mosque?
  Read full judgment →
• Haji Muhammad Sharif vs Muhammad Khalid alias Khalu and another1993 PLD Lahore 808 · Lahore High Court · 1993-07-12Read full judgment →
• Haji Muhammad Hussain vs Station House Officer, Peoples Colony, Gujranwala1993 P Cr. L J 305 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-07Read full judgment →
• Haji Muhammad Bashir vs Election Tribunal and others1993 CLC 830 · Lahore High Court · 1992-10-10Read full judgment →
• Haji Mubarik Ali and 4 others vs The State1993 MLD 1172 · Lahore High Court · 1991-12-14Read full judgment →
• Haji Mubarik Ali & 4 Other vs The StateK.L.R. 1993 .Criminal Cases 174 · Lahore High Court · 1991-12-14Read full judgment →
• Haji Mohd Siddique And Other vs The Chief Administrator of AuqafK.L.R. 1993 Civil Cases 315 · Lahore High CourtRead full judgment →
• Haji Mohammad Saleem vs Sultan KhanK.L.R. 1993 Civil Cases 95 · Lahore High Court · 1992-05-27Read full judgment →
• Hafiz Muhammad Yousaf vs Muhammad Hussain And 4 OtherK.L.R. 1993 Criminal Cases 86 · Lahore High Court · 1991-11-05Read full judgment →
• Hafiz Khushi Muhammad and 4 others vs The State1993 MLD 2281 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-14Read full judgment →
• Hafiz Abdul Majeed Shakir vs Mst. Batool Begum and 5 others1993 MLD 2171 · Lahore High Court · 1993-07-04Read full judgment →
• Habibullah vs District Magistrate, D.G. Khan and others1993 MLD 821 · Lahore High Court · 1993-01-05Read full judgment →
• Habibullah vs District Magistrate D.G. Khan And 2 OtherK.L.R. 1993 Criminal Cases 514 · Lahore High Court · 1993-01-05Read full judgment →
• Habib-Ur-Rehman and others vs State1993 MLD 1738 · Lahore High Court · 1992-09-23Read full judgment →
• Habib-Ul-Haque vs The Sargodha Vegetable Ghee and General Mills, Faisalabad & AnotherK.L.R. 1993 Labour & Service Cases 67 · Lahore High Court · 1991-12-15Read full judgment →
• Habib Ullah vs The StateK.L.R. 1993 Criminal Cases 230 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-15Read full judgment →
• Habib Ullah vs The State1993 P Cr. L J 939 · Lahore High Court · 1992-12-15Read full judgment →
• Habib Ullah and others vs Commissioner and others1993 CLC 2323 · Lahore High Court · 1993-04-12Read full judgment →