Latest Judgments

Newly reported judgments from the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the High Courts and tribunals, added as they are processed — free, full text, updated daily. Judgments marked NEW were added in the most recent update. 232594 judgments in total.

• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan Versus Dr. GHULAM ALI2016 GBLR 54 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-09Read full judgment →
• ABDUL RASHEED Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN2016 GBLR 53 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-02Read full judgment →
• Mst. SHABNAM RIAZ Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT/GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN2016 GBLR 49 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-07Read full judgment →
• CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL (PARC) Versus EJABAT SHAH2016 GBLR 46 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-23Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD ABUZAR Versus CHAIRMAN PARC BLUE AREA ISLAMABAD2016 GBLR 43 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-23Read full judgment →
• Mst. HAMIDA Versus ALI MARDAN KHAN2016 GBLR 427 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-05Read full judgment →
• ABDUL KARIM Versus Mst. ZEHRA2016 GBLR 424 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-05Read full judgment →
• RIFAQAT ALI Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan, Gilgit2016 GBLR 41 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-28Read full judgment →
• NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU Versus MUHAMMAD ALI YOGVI2016 GBLR 418 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-05Read full judgment →
• ALI HASSAN Versus AKHON ISMAIL2016 GBLR 415 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-05Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence2016 GBLR 413 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-03Read full judgment →
• PRESIDENT FIRST MICRO FINANCE SKARDU Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ2016 GBLR 410 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-03Read full judgment →
• State Versus HAIDER2016 GBLR 406 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-06Read full judgment →
• WAJAHAT ULLAH NASIM Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit2016 GBLR 39 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-30Read full judgment →
• State Versus SULIEMAN2016 GBLR 398 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-05Read full judgment →
• NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU Versus MIRBAZ ALI FARAZ2016 GBLR 390 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2017-01-09
  post-arrest bailbail cancellationcorruption and corrupt practicesNational Accountability Bureauillegal appointmentstentative assessmentprohibitory clause
  Summary & questions settled

  This criminal petition for the cancellation of post-arrest bail arises from a common judgment of the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court which granted bail to the respondents facing allegations under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 regarding illegal appointments and misuse of official authority. The core legal questions pertain to the legality of granting post-arrest bail in corruption cases involving National Accountability Bureau references and the principles governing tentative assessment at the bail stage. The Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit-Baltistan held that while bail may be maintained on exceptional grounds such as medical condition, post-arrest bail should generally be refused where prima facie material connects the accused to corruption and corrupt practices falling within the prohibitory clause. The court affirmed the bail granted to one respondent purely on medical grounds while cancelling the bail of the other two respondents, setting aside the Chief Court's order, and laying down that deeper appreciation of evidence is impermissible at the bail stage and that courts must rely on a tentative assessment of available material.

  Questions settled

  • Whether the High Court or Chief Court has jurisdiction under constitutional provisions to grant post-arrest bail in cases under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999?
  • Can bail once granted by the Chief Court be cancelled when prima facie material connects the accused to corruption and corrupt practices?
  • Is a deeper appreciation of evidence permissible at the bail stage under section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
  • Whether post-arrest bail can be maintained on medical grounds despite the existence of prima facie evidence connecting the accused to the crime?
  Read full judgment →
• SECRETARY LAW AND PROSECUTION GILGIT-BALTISTAN Versus ASLAM KHAN, SUPERINTENDENT, CUSTOMS AND BANKING COURT, GILGIT2016 GBLR 37 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-05Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Balstistan Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN (RETD. SP), GILGIT-BALTISTAN POLICE2016 GBLR 35 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-06Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan Versus Mst. MASNONA SHEHZADI2016 GBLR 33 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-03-24Read full judgment →
• State Versus IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN2016 GBLR 315 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-07-02
  unlawful assemblyvicarious liabilityanti-terrorismcommon objectconfessional statementcriminal appealmischief by firerioting
  Summary & questions settled

  This matter concerns criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondents by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court regarding a violent incident at Police Station Aliabad, where a mob destroyed government property and looted weapons. The core legal questions involved the admissibility of confessional statements under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the application of vicarious liability for members of an unlawful assembly under Section 149 of the Pakistan Penal Code, and whether technical investigative lapses invalidate a prosecution case. The Supreme Appellate Court majority held that the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt through ocular, circumstantial, and medical evidence, alongside voluntary confessional statements. The Court held that technical investigative flaws do not demolish the prosecution's case if the evidence is otherwise sufficient. The ratio establishes that members of an unlawful assembly are vicariously liable for offences committed in furtherance of a common object. Consequently, the Court set aside the Chief Court's acquittal, restored the trial court's convictions, and affirmed that the accused were responsible for the damages caused to the government exchequer.

  Questions settled

  • Does the acquittal of some co-accused on the same evidence necessitate the acquittal of all others?
  • Can a court convict members of an unlawful assembly under Section 149 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 if specific overt acts are not attributed to each individual?
  • Are confessional statements recorded under Section 21-H of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 admissible in evidence?
  • Do technical lapses in police investigation automatically invalidate a prosecution case?
  Read full judgment →
• STATE through National Accountability Bureau Versus QALAB ALI2016 GBLR 303 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-12-01
  National Accountability Bureaucorruption and corrupt practicesfraudulent loanjurisdictioncivil suit barvoluntary returnState Bank approval
  Summary & questions settled

  This criminal petition arose from a common impugned judgment of the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court, which had allowed petitions filed by the respondents and directed their immediate release. The respondents were accused of obtaining a fraudulent loan from a bank in connivance with bank officials, amounting to corruption and corrupt practices under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999. The core legal questions involved whether the National Accountability Bureau possessed the jurisdiction to conduct inquiries and investigations into fraudulent bank loans without prior approval from the Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan, and whether civil recovery proceedings or departmental actions barred criminal investigation. The Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan held that the National Accountability Bureau has the lawful authority to investigate offences of corruption and corrupt practices independent of civil suits or departmental proceedings, and that prior sanction from the State Bank of Pakistan is not required for fraudulent loans involving corruption. The court set aside the impugned judgment of the Chief Court and allowed the appeal, laying down that civil recovery suits do not preclude criminal investigations into financial fraud by anti-corruption bodies.

  Questions settled

  • Whether the National Accountability Bureau has jurisdiction to investigate fraudulent bank loans amounting to corruption and corrupt practices?
  • Does the institution of a civil recovery suit by a bank preclude the National Accountability Bureau from conducting an inquiry or investigation?
  • Is prior approval or reference from the Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan mandatory for initiating an investigation into fraudulent loans under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999?
  • Does the principle of double jeopardy apply when departmental action or civil proceedings are initiated alongside criminal investigations?
  Read full judgment →
• PENSION OF EX-CHIEF JUDGE SUPREME APPELLATE COURT Versus2016 GBLR 29 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-12Read full judgment →
• Mir SHAKEEL-UR-REHMAN Versus The STATE OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN2016 GBLR 280 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-30
  double jeopardytrial in absentiaanti-terrorismpemra ordinanceblasphemy allegationsjurisdictionmultiple firsquashment
  Summary & questions settled

  This matter arises from criminal appeals filed against a common judgment of the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court, which dismissed appeals against the trial court's conviction of the petitioners in absentia under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, relating to the telecast of a morning show program on Geo Channel featuring a Qawali. Multiple First Information Reports were registered across Pakistan, including Gilgit-Baltistan, alongside parallel proceedings and penalties imposed by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority under the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, and prior acquittals in other jurisdictions. The core legal questions concern double jeopardy, the jurisdictional reach and validity of trials conducted in absentia within Gilgit-Baltistan, and the exclusive domain of special media regulatory laws over broadcast contents. The Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit-Baltistan allowed the appeals and set aside the lower court judgments, holding that punishing the petitioners multiple times on the same set of facts and allegations violates the constitutional protection against double jeopardy under Article 13 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and that the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, being a special law, governs broadcast violations.

  Questions settled

  • Whether multiple FIRs and concurrent prosecutions across different jurisdictions on the same set of facts violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy?
  • Does the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, operate as a special law with exclusive jurisdiction over broadcast-related offences and regulatory penalties?
  • Can an accused person convicted in absentia maintain an appeal without surrendering to the custody of the court?
  • Are trials conducted in absentia by Anti-Terrorism Courts in Gilgit-Baltistan sustainable when fundamental constitutional safeguards are invoked?
  Read full judgment →
• DENG XIAO BIN DIRECTOR PAK CHINA SOST PORT COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED Versus REGISTRAR JOINT STOCK COMPANIES, GILGIT-BALTISTAN, GILGIT2016 GBLR 266 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-22Read full judgment →
• BAHADUR SHAH Versus Contractor REHMAN SHAH2016 GBLR 264 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-20Read full judgment →
• SHER AFRAZ Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan2016 GBLR 261 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-26Read full judgment →
• FAZAL SHAH Versus Molvi RAMAZAN2016 GBLR 258 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-19Read full judgment →
• ZAMINDARAN-E-SAMIGAL BALA AND PAIN Versus ZAMINDARAN-E-DODOSHAL2016 GBLR 255 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-22Read full judgment →
• MANSHAH ALI KHAN Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan2016 GBLR 252 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-07-21Read full judgment →
• UBAID-UR-REHMAN MUQADDAM Versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN2016 GBLR 250 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-03Read full judgment →
• MINISTRY OF DEFENCE Versus Major MUHAMMAD FAROOQ2016 GBLR 24 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-05Read full judgment →
• BABAR KHAN Versus GHULAM2016 GBLR 248 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-02Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan Versus SAJID ULLAH2016 GBLR 246 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-26Read full judgment →
• CHAIRMAN PARC Versus KHALID IKHLAQ2016 GBLR 244 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-16Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTER Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT2016 GBLR 243 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-04Read full judgment →
• AHLIAN-E-ZAIL Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan2016 GBLR 240 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-19Read full judgment →
• Mst. ZAINABA Versus SHER SULIEMAN2016 GBLR 237 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-11-03Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD NASEEM Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan2016 GBLR 235 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-20Read full judgment →
• Mst. MEHERJANI Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan2016 GBLR 232 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-08Read full judgment →
• Mst. FATIMA Versus Mst. HALIMA2016 GBLR 22 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-12Read full judgment →
• Raja SHAHDURAN ALI Versus HABIB-UR-REHMAN2016 GBLR 229 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-05Read full judgment →
• SENATE KIU Versus KARIM KHAN2016 GBLR 225 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-16Read full judgment →
• The AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Versus Haji JUMA SHAH2016 GBLR 223 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-23Read full judgment →
• ZAFAR IQBAL Versus BABA JAN2016 GBLR 218 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-28Read full judgment →
• NAZIM Versus MUHAMMAD MUSA2016 GBLR 216 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-19Read full judgment →
• State Versus EHSAN ALI, ADVOCATE2016 GBLR 214 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-10-07Read full judgment →
• SAFA Versus State2016 GBLR 209 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-10-17Read full judgment →
• REHMAN MANZOOR Versus AMIR SHAHZAD2016 GBLR 1 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-03-31Read full judgment →
• COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY MST. HOORI Versus2016 GBLR 19 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-10-08Read full judgment →
• HALEEMA SADIA Versus SHAKEEL AHMED2016 GBLR 199 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-12-13Read full judgment →
• State Versus BILAL AHMED2016 GBLR 196 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-11-03Read full judgment →
• FARMAN ALI Versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN2016 GBLR 193 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-12-28Read full judgment →
• Engineer YAWAR ABBAS Versus SECRETARY KASHMIR AFFAIRS GB2016 GBLR 18 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-14Read full judgment →
• UMAR KHAN Versus ALL JUMLA MALIKAN ZANGARI HETI GOHARABAD TEHSIL CHILAS2016 GBLR 189 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-11-03Read full judgment →
• AFZAL KHAN Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF2016 GBLR 185 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-11-03Read full judgment →
• SHABAN ALI Versus Mst. ZAINABA2016 GBLR 183 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-11-23Read full judgment →
• PRINCE SALEEM KHAN Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President NBP2016 GBLR 174 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-03Read full judgment →
• ABBAS Versus RAZA2016 GBLR 171 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-12-28Read full judgment →
• ZUBAIR AHMED Versus State2016 GBLR 166 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-08Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD ABIDEEN Versus State2016 GBLR 165 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-17Read full judgment →
• SALAHUDDIN Versus State2016 GBLR 163 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-28Read full judgment →
• ISFANDIYAR Versus State2016 GBLR 161 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-24Read full judgment →
• ABDUL RAZIQ Versus Mst. KHOSHAB JUMMA2016 GBLR 15 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-20Read full judgment →
• REHMAT AZEEM Versus NASIR IQBAL2016 GBLR 158 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-11Read full judgment →
• GUL ZEB Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ2016 GBLR 152 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-18Read full judgment →
• ABDUL RAHIM Versus State2016 GBLR 148 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-03-24Read full judgment →
• COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY GENERAL MANAGER SERENA HOTEL GILGIT Versus2016 GBLR 13 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-07-22Read full judgment →
• NAVEED HUSSAIN Versus State2016 GBLR 139 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-28Read full judgment →
• WAZIR Versus State2016 GBLR 131 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-08-11Read full judgment →
• KHUSH BAIG, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan2016 GBLR 12 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-10Read full judgment →
• State Versus NIAMAT WALI2016 GBLR 127 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-09-01Read full judgment →
• MEHBOOB RIAZ Versus FIYAZ AHMED2016 GBLR 124 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-07-21Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD AMIN Versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN2016 GBLR 120 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-07Read full judgment →
• PRESIDENT AL-SABAH MULTIPURPOSE SOCIETY GUPIS OFFICE PUNIAL ROAD, GILGIT Versus ZAR NAZIR KHAN2016 GBLR 10 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-13Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan Versus Dr. JOHAR ALI2016 GBLR 108 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-06-12Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan, Gilgit Versus Dr. MUHAMMAD ZABOOR2016 GBLR 106 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-04-29Read full judgment →
• Mst. HOOR NAZ Versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT HEADQUARTER HOSPITAL, GILGIT2016 GBLR 103 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-02Read full judgment →
• SHABIR WALI KHAN Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN2016 GBLR 100 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2016-05-03Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR KARAKORAM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY GILGIT2015 GBLR 98 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-30Read full judgment →
• ASHRAT Versus State2015 GBLR 95 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-09-02Read full judgment →
• CHIEF MINISTER Versus Justice (Retd.) MUHAMMAD KHURSHEED KHAN2015 GBLR 85 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-30Read full judgment →
• CHAIRMAN AGA KHAN EDUCATION SERVICE PAKISTAN Versus Mst. SHABNAM2015 GBLR 406 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-05-18Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD TAQI Versus MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN2015 GBLR 404 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-10-06Read full judgment →
• CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL (PARC) Versus KHALID AKHLAQ2015 GBLR 402 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-04-15Read full judgment →
• REHMAT ALAM Versus Hafiz EHSANULLAH2015 GBLR 399 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-23Read full judgment →
• SAIF ULLAH Versus Hafiz EHSAN ULLAH2015 GBLR 397 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-04-22Read full judgment →
• NADRA AUTHORITIES Versus2015 GBLR 38 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2011-06-22Read full judgment →
• SHORTAGE OF FLOUR IN GILGIT-BALTISTAN Versus2015 GBLR 379 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2014-05-08Read full judgment →
• SHUKOOR NIAZ Versus ABDUL AZIZ alias GOJUR2015 GBLR 376 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2013-10-23Read full judgment →
• FATIMA BI Versus ABDUR REHIM2015 GBLR 373 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-03-30Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan Versus Mst. YASMIN SHER WALI2015 GBLR 372 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-05Read full judgment →
• SEHAT WALI GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR Versus Haji ESSA KHAN2015 GBLR 371 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-04-21Read full judgment →
• COMPLAINT AGAINST POLICE PERSONNEL Versus2015 GBLR 369 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-27Read full judgment →
• KAMAL HUSSAIN Versus SHABBIR AHMED2015 GBLR 366 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-09-14Read full judgment →
• BARAT ALI Versus Mst. MAHER BANU2015 GBLR 364 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-09-17Read full judgment →
• HUSSAIN AKBAR Versus SPEAKER GBLA GILGIT2015 GBLR 362 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2014-03-27Read full judgment →
• PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT Versus MERA JAN2015 GBLR 361 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-23Read full judgment →
• MUHAMMAD ALI YOUGVI Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SKARDU2015 GBLR 358 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-26Read full judgment →
• COMPLAINT AGAINST AGPR GILGIT Versus2015 GBLR 355 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2012-03-14Read full judgment →
• ALI KHAN Versus The DIRECTOR CIVIL SUPPLY AND TRANSPORT GILGIT2015 GBLR 350 · Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan · 2015-11-02Read full judgment →