- Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact by subordinate courts regarding the execution of a power of attorney?
- Does the revisional jurisdiction permit interference with concurrent factual determinations concerning a person's mental capacity?
- What is the standard for granting leave to appeal against concurrent findings of fact relating to property transactions?
Question search
40 judgments answering questions like “concurrent findings of fact”
- Can a High Court in second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 reverse concurrent findings of fact based on a mere reappraisal of evidence?
- Under what circumstances can a High Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal?
- Does the mere possibility of an alternative view of evidence justify the reversal of concurrent findings of fact by a High Court?
- Can the High Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908?
- Does a second appeal lie against concurrent findings of fact if the lower courts have properly evaluated the evidence on record?
- Is a High Court empowered to reverse concurrent findings of fact where no error of law or procedural defect is established?
- What is the scope of interference by a High Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 regarding concurrent findings of fact?
- Can a High Court in a second appeal reverse concurrent findings of fact solely by reappraising the evidence on record?
- Under what exceptional circumstances can concurrent findings of fact be disturbed or set aside in a second appeal?
- Whether a constitutional writ petition is a proper remedy to challenge concurrent findings of fact in ejectment matters?
- Does the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact regarding default in rent and personal requirement?
- Is the refusal of the High Court to exercise its discretionary constitutional jurisdiction unexceptionable when findings of fact are conclusive?
- Whether concurrent findings of fact by the courts below regarding ownership and possession warrant interference by the Supreme Court?
- Does an unregistered sale-deed for a consideration of less than one hundred rupees override a registered sale-deed and concurrent revenue records?
- Whether a petition for leave to appeal is maintainable against concurrent judgments that suffer from no legal infirmity, misreading, or non-reading of evidence?
- Whether the question of relationship between a vendor and a pre-emptor is a question of fact?
- Can concurrent findings of fact by the trial court and appellate court be interfered with in a civil revision?
- Does a misreading of evidence argument alone warrant interference by a revisional court in concurrent factual findings?
- Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a property and inheritance dispute?
- Can a regular second appeal be maintained against concurrent findings of fact regarding inheritance shares?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Will the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact by lower courts in a family dispute regarding dowry?
- Can technical procedural objections without proof of prejudice form the basis for setting aside concurrent findings of fact?
- Does a defense of being 'Khana Damad' and shifting of dowry articles raise disputed questions of fact?
- Is a constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 maintainable against concurrent findings of fact by lower courts?
- Under what circumstances will the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact recorded by lower courts?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Whether the High Court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908?
- Is the High Court competent to reverse findings of lower courts based on misreading and non-consideration of material evidence?
- Are concurrent findings of fact recorded by courts below sacrosanct in revisional jurisdiction?
- Whether long-standing entries in revenue records left uncorrected for a significant period support concurrent findings of fact against a party claiming ownership?
- Does the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding revenue record entries without sufficient justification?
- Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact regarding the validity of a gift in the absence of any justification to re-examine the evidence?
- Can a petitioner successfully challenge concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal before the Supreme Court without showing exceptional circumstances?
- Whether concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding inheritance and gift can be interfered with by the Supreme Court?
- Does an alleged misplacement of the burden of proof furnish justification for setting aside concurrent findings of fact where no prejudice is suffered?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal regarding specific performance?
- Is leave to appeal maintainable against the dismissal of a second appeal where concurrent findings of fact contain no legal infirmity?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Can the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a petition for special leave to appeal?
- Is a finding regarding the degree of relationship for inheritance purposes considered a question of fact?
- Under what circumstances can a High Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in its revisional jurisdiction?
- Whether the Supreme Court will interfere with concurrent findings of fact concurrently recorded by the courts below and upheld by the High Court in civil revision?
- Can a petitioner challenge concurrent factual determinations regarding inheritance without pointing out any illegality or legal infirmity in the impugned judgments?
- Can the High Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure merely because it reaches a different conclusion upon reappraising the evidence?
- Under what specific circumstances is the High Court justified in disturbing concurrent findings of fact recorded by subordinate courts under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure?
- Does the non-production of an alleged witness or minor discrepancies in witness statements justify reversing concurrent findings of fact under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the findings are otherwise supported by oral and documentary evidence?
- Can the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a civil suit regarding inheritance?
- Does the allegation of misreading of evidence provide sufficient grounds for the Supreme Court to grant leave to appeal against concurrent findings of fact?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Whether the High Court in second appeal has jurisdiction to interfere with concurrent findings of fact regarding the valuation of dowry articles?
- Under what circumstances can the High Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Can a High Court in second appeal reverse concurrent findings of fact by lower courts based solely on a reappraisal of evidence?
- What are the permissible grounds for a Second Appellate Court to interfere with concurrent findings of fact under Section 100, C.P.C.?
- Does an affirmation of a trial court's finding by the first appellate court, with discussion of evidence, qualify as a concurrent finding of fact?
and 2 more questions settled by this judgment
- Can leave to appeal be granted when three lower courts have recorded concurrent findings of fact on a controverted issue?
- Does a question of law arise from concurrent factual determinations regarding possession under an agreement to sell?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Can the High Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908?
- What constitutes sufficient ground for a High Court to set aside concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts?
- Is a party entitled to a remand for retrial to examine additional witnesses after an inordinate delay when concurrent findings are otherwise sustainable?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Can the Supreme Court interfere with concurrent findings of fact made by the lower courts in a rent matter?
- Whether concurrent findings on default and subletting are open to scrutiny in the absence of misreading of evidence?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
- Whether concurrent findings of fact recorded by the lower courts can be interfered with in a second appeal?
- Does an observation by a High Court that a different conclusion might be possible on re-appraising evidence warrant interference with concurrent findings of fact?
and 1 more question settled by this judgment
How this works. Each question below was written by an AI reading the judgment, and records a point that judgment settles. Questions are not grouped by meaning: legally opposite questions can look almost identical to a machine, so we show you what each judgment actually says and let you judge. Always read the judgment before citing it.